The Multidimensional Nature of Research Ethics: Letters Issued by a French Research Ethics Committee Included Similar Proportions of Ethical and Scientific Queries
dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | HAASER, Thibaud | |
hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
dc.contributor.author | BOUTELOUP, Vincent | |
dc.contributor.author | BERDAI, Driss | |
dc.contributor.author | SAUX, Marie-Claude | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-18T08:14:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-18T08:14:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1556-2654 (Electronic) 1556-2646 (Linking) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/170052 | |
dc.description.abstractEn | Debate is ongoing concerning the activities and functioning of Research Ethics Committees (REC), especially a possible science-or-ethics dichotomy in research ethics review. We retrospectively analyzed 145 letters issued by a French REC over 18 months. All queries were classified in three levels: qualification (definition of the problem), category (aggregation of broader topics) and finally fields (ethical, scientific, or administrative). Overall, 971 queries were identified, of which 407 (42%), 379 (39%), and 135 (14%) were deemed ethical, scientific, and administrative queries, respectively. The most frequent concern was about participants' information. The main influencing factor was the profession of the reporting readers-scientific queries were more frequently raised by a methodologist, whereas ethical queries were more frequently raised by an ethicist. These results indicate that research ethics review is a multidimensional task that should be considered a collaborative effort. | |
dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
dc.subject.en | Research ethics | |
dc.subject.en | Research ethics committee | |
dc.subject.en | IRB performance/quality/assessment/evaluation | |
dc.subject.en | Bioethics | |
dc.subject.en | Ethics education | |
dc.title.en | The Multidimensional Nature of Research Ethics: Letters Issued by a French Research Ethics Committee Included Similar Proportions of Ethical and Scientific Queries | |
dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/15562646221093218 | en_US |
dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie | en_US |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 35414297 | en_US |
bordeaux.journal | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics | en_US |
bordeaux.page | 242-253 | en_US |
bordeaux.volume | 17 | en_US |
bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Bordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219 | en_US |
bordeaux.issue | 3 | en_US |
bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
bordeaux.institution | INSERM | en_US |
bordeaux.team | PHARES_BPH | en_US |
bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
hal.identifier | hal-03818753 | |
hal.version | 1 | |
hal.date.transferred | 2022-10-18T08:14:34Z | |
hal.export | true | |
dc.rights.cc | Pas de Licence CC | en_US |
bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Empirical%20Research%20on%20Human%20Research%20Ethics&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242-253&rft.epage=242-253&rft.eissn=1556-2654%20(Electronic)%201556-2646%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1556-2654%20(Electronic)%201556-2646%20(Linking)&rft.au=HAASER,%20Thibaud&BOUTELOUP,%20Vincent&BERDAI,%20Driss&SAUX,%20Marie-Claude&rft.genre=article |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
---|---|---|---|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |