Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorCACCIAMANI, Federica
dc.contributor.authorGODEFROY, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorBRAMBATI, Simona M.
dc.contributor.authorMIGLIACCIO, Raffaella
dc.contributor.authorEPELBAUM, Stephane
dc.contributor.authorMONTEMBEAULT, Maxime
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T09:46:26Z
dc.date.available2022-10-17T09:46:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-16
dc.identifier.issn1663-4365 (Print) 1663-4365 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/170031
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: Characterizing self- and informant-reported cognitive complaints, as well as awareness of cognitive decline (ACD), is useful for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, complaints and ACD related to cognitive functions other than memory are poorly studied. Furthermore, it remains unclear which source of information is the most useful to distinguish various groups on the AD spectrum. Methods: Self- and informant-reported complaints were measured with the Everyday Cognition questionnaire (ECog-Subject and ECog-StudyPartner) in four domains (memory, language, visuospatial, and executive). ACD was measured as the subject-informant discrepancy in the four ECog scores. We compared the ECog and ACD scores across cognitive domains between four groups: 71 amyloid-positive individuals with amnestic AD, 191 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or 118 cognitively normal (CN), and 211 amyloid-negative CN controls, selected from the ADNI database. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the ECog and ACD scores in discriminating clinical groups. Results: Self- and informant-reported complaints were generally distributed as follows: memory, language, executive, and visuospatial (from the most severe to the least severe). Both groups of CN participants presented on average more memory and language complaints than their informant. MCI participants showed good agreement with their informants. AD participants presented anosognosia in all domains, but especially for the executive domain. The four ECog-StudyPartner sub-scores allowed excellent discrimination between groups in almost all classifications and performed significantly better than the other two classifiers considered. The ACD was excellent in distinguishing the participants with AD from the two groups of CN participants. The ECog-Subject was the least accurate in discriminating groups in four of the six classifications performed. Conclusion: In research, the study of complaint and anosognosia should not be reduced solely to the memory domain. In clinical practice, non-amnestic complaints could also be linked to Alzheimer's disease. The presence of an informant also seems necessary given its accuracy as a source of information.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enAwareness
dc.subject.enMetacognition
dc.subject.enAnosognosia
dc.subject.enAlzheimer’s disease
dc.subject.enLanguage
dc.subject.enExecutive function
dc.subject.enMemory
dc.subject.enVisuospatial abilities
dc.title.enDifferential Patterns of Domain-Specific Cognitive Complaints and Awareness Across the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnagi.2022.811739en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed35813963en_US
bordeaux.journalFrontiers in Aging Neuroscienceen_US
bordeaux.volume14en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamPHARES_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDFondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimeren_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santéen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDHeart And Stroke Foundation Of Quebecen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDCanadian Institutes of Health Researchen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDAssociation France Alzheimeren_US
hal.identifierhal-03817487
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2022-10-17T09:46:29Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20Aging%20Neuroscience&rft.date=2022-06-16&rft.volume=14&rft.eissn=1663-4365%20(Print)%201663-4365%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1663-4365%20(Print)%201663-4365%20(Linking)&rft.au=CACCIAMANI,%20Federica&GODEFROY,%20Valerie&BRAMBATI,%20Simona%20M.&MIGLIACCIO,%20Raffaella&EPELBAUM,%20Stephane&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée