Afficher la notice abrégée

Brownfields to green fields : Realising wider benefits from practical contaminant phytomanagement strategies

dc.contributor.authorCUNDY, A.B.
dc.contributor.authorBARDOS, R.P.
hal.structure.identifierUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life [Vienne, Autriche] [BOKU]
dc.contributor.authorPUSCHENREITER, Markus
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorMENCH, Michel
hal.structure.identifierInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques [INERIS]
dc.contributor.authorBERT, Valérie
dc.contributor.authorFRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang
hal.structure.identifierSaxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology
dc.contributor.authorMULLER, Ingo
dc.contributor.authorLI, Xiaojun
hal.structure.identifierHasselt University [UHasselt]
dc.contributor.authorWEYENS, Nele
hal.structure.identifierHasselt University [UHasselt]
dc.contributor.authorWITTERS, Nele
hal.structure.identifierHasselt University [UHasselt]
dc.contributor.authorVANGRONSVELD, Jaco
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T13:24:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T13:24:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158076
dc.description.abstractEnGentle remediation options (GROs) are risk management strategies or technologies involving plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as effective risk management. GRO strategies can be customised along contaminant linkages, and can generate a range of wider economic, environmental and societal benefits in contaminated land management (and in brownfields management more widely). The application of GROs as practical on-site remedial solutions is still limited however, particularly in Europe and at trace element (typically metal and metalloid) contaminated sites. This paper discusses challenges to the practical adoption of GROs in contaminated land management, and outlines the decision support tools and best practice guidance developed in the European Commission FP7-funded GREENLAND project aimed at overcoming these challenges. The GREENLAND guidance promotes a refocus from phytoremediation to wider GROs- or phyto-management based approaches which place realisation of wider benefits at the core of site design, and where gentle remediation technologies can be applied as part of integrated, mixed, site risk management solutions or as part of “holding strategies” for vacant sites. The combination of GROs with renewables, both in terms of biomass generation but also with green technologies such as wind and solar power, can provide a range of economic and other benefits and can potentially support the return of low-level contaminated sites to productive usage, while combining GROs with urban design and landscape architecture, and integrating GRO strategies with sustainable urban drainage systems and community gardens/parkland (particularly for health and leisure benefits), has large potential for triggering GRO application and in realising wider benefits in urban and suburban systems. Quantifying these wider benefits and value (above standard economic returns) will be important in leveraging funding for GRO application and soft site end-use more widely at vacant or underutilized sites.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subject.enCONTAMINATED LAND
dc.subject.enBROWNFIELDS
dc.subject.enGENTLE REMEDIATION OPTIONS
dc.subject.enPHYTOREMEDIATION
dc.subject.enPHYTOMANAGEMENT
dc.subject.enHEAVY METALS
dc.subject.enDECISION SUPPORT TOOLS
dc.title.enBrownfields to green fields : Realising wider benefits from practical contaminant phytomanagement strategies
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.028
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalJournal of Environmental Management
bordeaux.page67-77
bordeaux.volume184
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioGeCo (Biodiversité Gènes & Communautés) - UMR 1202*
bordeaux.issue1
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierineris-01854124
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//ineris-01854124v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Management&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67-77&rft.epage=67-77&rft.eissn=0301-4797&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.au=CUNDY,%20A.B.&BARDOS,%20R.P.&PUSCHENREITER,%20Markus&MENCH,%20Michel&BERT,%20Val%C3%A9rie&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée