Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

A multicriteria risk analysis to evaluate impacts of forest management alternatives on forest health in Europe

hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorJACTEL, Herve
hal.structure.identifierInstituto Superior de Agronomia [Lisboa] [ISA]
dc.contributor.authorBRANCO, Manuela
hal.structure.identifierInstitute for Forest Growth
dc.contributor.authorDUNCKER, Philipp
hal.structure.identifierForest Research, Northern Research Station
dc.contributor.authorGARDINER, Barry
hal.structure.identifierDepartment of Forest Management in Mountain Regions
dc.contributor.authorGRODZKI, Wojciech
hal.structure.identifierDepartment of Ecology
dc.contributor.authorLÅNGSTRÖM, Bo
hal.structure.identifierUniversidade Nova de Lisboa = NOVA University Lisbon [NOVA]
dc.contributor.authorMOREIRA, Francisco
hal.structure.identifierUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences [Vienne, Autriche] [BOKU]
dc.contributor.authorNETHERER, Sigrid
hal.structure.identifierForest Research, Northern Research Station
dc.contributor.authorNICOLL, Bruce
hal.structure.identifierUnité de recherches forestières [BORDX PIERR UR ]
dc.contributor.authorORAZIO, Christophe
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
hal.structure.identifierDépartement Santé des Forêts
dc.contributor.authorPIOU, Dominique
hal.structure.identifierCentre for Ecosystem Studies
dc.contributor.authorSCHELHAAS, Mart-Jan
hal.structure.identifierAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg = University of Freiburg
dc.contributor.authorTOJIC, Karl
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1708-3087
dc.description.abstractEnDue to climate change, forests are likely to face new hazards, which may require adaptation of our existing silvicultural practices. However, it is difficult to imagine a forest management approach that can simultaneously minimize all risks of damage. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been developed to help decision makers choose between actions that require reaching a compromise among criteria of different weights. We adapted this method and produced a multicriteria risk analysis (MCRA) to compare the risk of damage associated with various forest management systems with a range of management intensity. The objective was to evaluate the effect of four forest management alternatives (FMAs) (i.e., close to nature, extensive management with combined objectives, intensive even-aged plantations, and short-rotation forestry for biomass production) on biotic and abiotic risks of damage in eight regional case studies combining three forest biomes (Boreal, Continental, Atlantic) and five tree species ( Eucalyptus globulus, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris, Picea sitchensis, and Picea abies) relevant to wood production in Europe. Specific forest susceptibility to a series of abiotic (wind, fire, and snow) and biotic (insect pests, pathogenic fungi, and mammal herbivores) hazards were defined by expert panels and subsequently weighted by corresponding likelihood. The PROMETHEE ranking method was applied to rank the FMAs from the most to the least at risk. Overall, risk was lower in short-rotation forests designed to produce wood biomass, because of the reduced stand susceptibility to the most damaging hazards. At the opposite end of the management intensity gradient, close-to-nature systems also had low overall risk, due to lower stand value exposed to damage. Intensive even-aged forestry appeared to be subject to the greatest risk, irrespective of tree species and bioclimatic zone. These results seem to be robust as no significant differences in relative ranking of the four FMAs were detected between the combinations of forest biomes and tree species.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherResilience Alliance
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
dc.subjectdamage
dc.subjectMCRA
dc.subjectsilviculture
dc.subject.enabiotic
dc.subject.enbiotic
dc.subject.enhazard
dc.title.enA multicriteria risk analysis to evaluate impacts of forest management alternatives on forest health in Europe
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.5751/ES-04897-170452
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]
bordeaux.journalEcology and Society
bordeaux.page25 p.
bordeaux.volume17
bordeaux.issue4
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02647951
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02647951v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20Society&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=25%20p.&rft.epage=25%20p.&rft.eissn=1708-3087&rft.issn=1708-3087&rft.au=JACTEL,%20Herve&BRANCO,%20Manuela&DUNCKER,%20Philipp&GARDINER,%20Barry&GRODZKI,%20Wojciech&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem