Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre Fruitier et Forestier [PIAF]
dc.contributor.authorCOCHARD, Hervé
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorDELZON, Sylvain
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T12:51:49Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T12:51:49Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1286-4560
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/157352
dc.description.abstractEnTrees can pull tons of water up to 100 m above ground, whereas even the best engineered suction pumps can manage only 10 m at most. Beyond this height, the pull of gravity exceeds atmospheric pressure. The pressure at the top of the water column then becomes negative, and pumps drain by a process of vaporization called cavitation. So how do plants, particularly tall trees, cope with cavitation? Do they have an astonishingly high resistance to this process or are they routinely exposed to cavitation events and possess remarkable repair capacities? These questions were first asked when the mechanism of sap ascent in trees was discovered in the late nineteenth century (Brown 2013), but were not answered until reliable methods for measuring cavitation were introduced a century later. Early studies of plant hydraulics suggested that cavitation occurred only in conditions of severe drought (Fig. 1a). However, many studies carried out in the last decade have called this understanding of tree physiology and ecology into question. Diurnal cycles of cavitation and repair have been reported, even in well watered plants, suggesting that plants routinely face cavitation and recover easily from it. Writing in Plant Cell and Environment, Wheeler et al. (2013) provided compelling new experimental evidence that trees are much more resistant to cavitation than previously thought, demonstrating that this change of paradigm should now be reconsidered.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010)
dc.rights.urihttp://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/licences/copyright/
dc.subject.enCavitation
dc.subject.enembolism
dc.subject.enwater relations
dc.subject.endrought
dc.title.enHydraulic failure and repair are not routine in trees
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13595-013-0317-5
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Sciences agricoles
bordeaux.journalAnnals of Forest Science
bordeaux.page659-661
bordeaux.volume70
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioGeCo (Biodiversité Gènes & Communautés) - UMR 1202*
bordeaux.issue7
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-00964531
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-00964531v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20Forest%20Science&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=659-661&rft.epage=659-661&rft.eissn=1286-4560&rft.issn=1286-4560&rft.au=COCHARD,%20Herv%C3%A9&DELZON,%20Sylvain&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée