Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Developing decision support tools for the selection of "gentle" remediation approaches

hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Brighton
dc.contributor.authorONWUBUYA, Kene
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Brighton
dc.contributor.authorCUNDY, Andrew
hal.structure.identifierUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences [Vienne, Autriche] [BOKU]
dc.contributor.authorPUSCHENREITER, Markus
hal.structure.identifierLuleå University of Technology = Luleå Tekniska Universitet [LUT]
dc.contributor.authorKUMPIENE, Jurate
hal.structure.identifierEnvironment Agency
dc.contributor.authorBONE, Brian
hal.structure.identifierEnvironment Agency
dc.contributor.authorGREAVES, Jon
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Brighton
dc.contributor.authorTEASDALE, Phillip
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorMENCH, Michel
hal.structure.identifierCzech Technical University in Prague [CTU]
dc.contributor.authorTLUSTOS, Pavel
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Brighton
dc.contributor.authorMIKHALOVSKY, Sergey
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Brighton
dc.contributor.authorWAITE, Steve
hal.structure.identifierAustrian Institute of Technology [AIT]
dc.contributor.authorFRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang
hal.structure.identifierRuhr University Bochum = Ruhr-Universität Bochum [RUB]
dc.contributor.authorMARSCHNER, Bernd
hal.structure.identifierSaxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology
dc.contributor.authorMULLER, Ingo
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.description.abstractEnA range of tools have been proposed to support decision making in contaminated land remediation. From a European perspective it is clear, however, that there are considerable national differences in the decision support process, and more generally in the extent to which this process supports the selection of less invasive, alternative remediation options such as phytoremediation, in situ immobilisation etc. (referred to here as “gentle” remediation technologies). In this paper we present results from the recently completed European Union ERANET SNOWMAN project SUMATECS (Sustainable Management of Trace Element Contaminated Sites), and critically review available decision support tools in terms of their fitness for purpose for the application of gentle remediation technologies. Stakeholder feedback indicates a lack of knowledge amongst stakeholders of currently available decision support tools. We propose that decision support which focuses on gentle remediation is more strongly incorporated into existing, well-established (national) decision support tools / decision-frameworks, to promote more widespread use and uptake.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectIMMOBILISATION
dc.subjectTERRAIN CONTAMINE
dc.subject.enDECISION SUPPORT TOOLS
dc.subject.enCONTAMINATED LAND
dc.subject.enLAND REMEDIATION
dc.subject.enGENTLE REMEDIATION
dc.subject.enPHYTOREMEDIATION
dc.title.enDeveloping decision support tools for the selection of "gentle" remediation approaches
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.017
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Ecologie, Environnement
bordeaux.journalScience of the Total Environment
bordeaux.page6132-6142
bordeaux.volume407
bordeaux.issue24
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02667622
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02667622v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Science%20of%20the%20Total%20Environment&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=407&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6132-6142&rft.epage=6132-6142&rft.eissn=0048-9697&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.au=ONWUBUYA,%20Kene&CUNDY,%20Andrew&PUSCHENREITER,%20Markus&KUMPIENE,%20Jurate&BONE,%20Brian&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem