Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHARTVIGSEN, L.
dc.contributor.authorKONGSTED, A.
dc.contributor.authorVACH, W.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorSALMI, Louis Rachid
dc.contributor.authorHESTBAEK, L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-16T11:01:38Z
dc.date.available2020-11-16T11:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifier.issn1938-1344 (Electronic) 0190-6011 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/14022
dc.description.abstractEnStudy Design A prospective observational study. Background A diagnostic classification algorithm was developed by Petersen et al., consisting of 12 categories based on a standardized examination protocol with the primary purpose of identifying clinically homogeneous subgroups of low back pain (LBP). Objectives To investigate if a diagnostic classification algorithm is associated with activity limitation and LBP intensity at 2-week and 3-month follow up, and 1-year trajectories of LBP intensity, and if it improves prediction of outcome when added to a set of known predictors. Methods 934 consecutive adult patients, with new episodes of LBP, who were visiting chiropractic practices in primary care were categorized according to the Petersen classification. Outcomes were disability and pain intensity measured at 2 weeks and 3 months, and 1-year trajectories of LBP based on weekly responses to text messages. Associations were tested in linear and logistic regression models. In a subgroup of patients, the number of visits to primary and secondary care was described. Results The Petersen classification was statistically significantly associated with all outcomes (p<0.001) but explained very little of the variance (R(2)=0.00-0.05). Patients in the 'Nerve root involvement category' had the most pain and activity limitation and the most visits to primary and secondary care. Patients in the 'myofascial pain category' were the least affected. Conclusion The Petersen classification was not helpful for determining individual prognosis in patients with LBP receiving usual care in chiropractic practice. However, patients should be examined for potential nerve root involvement to improve prediction of likely outcomes. Level of Evidence "Outcomes" research, level 2c. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 8 May 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.8083.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enIETO
dc.title.enDoes a Diagnostic Classification Algorithm Help to Predict the Course of Low Back Pain? A Study of Danish Chiropractic Patients With One-Year Follow Up
dc.title.alternativeJ Orthop Sports Phys Theren_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2519/jospt.2018.8083en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed29739300en_US
bordeaux.journaljournal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapyen_US
bordeaux.page837-846en_US
bordeaux.volume48en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue11en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamIETOen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03194155
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-04-09T11:15:52Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&amp;rft.date=2018-11&amp;rft.volume=48&amp;rft.issue=11&amp;rft.spage=837-846&amp;rft.epage=837-846&amp;rft.eissn=1938-1344%20(Electronic)%200190-6011%20(Linking)&amp;rft.issn=1938-1344%20(Electronic)%200190-6011%20(Linking)&amp;rft.au=HARTVIGSEN,%20L.&amp;KONGSTED,%20A.&amp;VACH,%20W.&amp;SALMI,%20Louis%20Rachid&amp;HESTBAEK,%20L.&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée