Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCABOT, Mathilde
dc.contributor.authorDAVIET, Jean Christophe
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDUCLOS, Noemie C.
IDREF: 188657371
dc.contributor.authorBERNIKIER, David
dc.contributor.authorSALLE, Jean Yves
dc.contributor.authorCOMPAGNAT, Maxence
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-16T08:39:52Z
dc.date.available2022-05-16T08:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-17
dc.identifier.issn1532-821X (Electronic) 0003-9993 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/140061
dc.description.abstractEnOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and test retest reliability of physical activity trackers (accelerometer, multi-sensor, smartphone, pedometer) for estimating energy expenditure during walking in individuals with stroke. DATA SOURCES: Webline, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine and Wiley Online Library databases from 1980 to November 2020. STUDY SELECTION: The inclusion criteria were studies that examined the validity of portable physical activity trackers for estimating energy expenditure in individuals with stroke during walking activities compared to indirect calorimetry. DATA EXTRACTION: This systematic review was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the methodological quality of the included studies was determined with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The study selection was made by two blind observers. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 3677 articles, 3647 were excluded after duplicates removing and title and abstracts reviewing. Thirty articles were included for full-text analysis. Eight articles met the inclusion criteria (184 individuals with stroke) and were included in the data synthesis and meta-analysis. For all monitors, activities and placements, the overall level of correlation with indirect calorimetry was 0.34 (CI95% 0.23; 0.44). After subgroups analysis, we showed that type and placement have no effect on the level of validity. Test-retest reliability was high, with Intra Class Correlation equal to 0.89 (CI95% 0.76; 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Portable physical activity monitors provided a low correlation with indirect calorimetry during walking in individuals with stroke. It seems essential to pursue studies to improve their validity in this population.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enEnergy expenditure
dc.subject.enAccelerometery
dc.subject.enStroke
dc.subject.enActivity tracker
dc.subject.enGold standard
dc.subject.enPhysical activity
dc.title.enFirst systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity and test retest reliability of physical activity monitors for estimating energy expenditure during walking in individuals with stroke
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.020en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed35443210en_US
bordeaux.journalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamACTIVE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03668846
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2022-05-16T08:39:53Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Physical%20Medicine%20and%20Rehabilitation&rft.date=2022-04-17&rft.eissn=1532-821X%20(Electronic)%200003-9993%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1532-821X%20(Electronic)%200003-9993%20(Linking)&rft.au=CABOT,%20Mathilde&DAVIET,%20Jean%20Christophe&DUCLOS,%20Noemie%20C.&BERNIKIER,%20David&SALLE,%20Jean%20Yves&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée