Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierDauphine Recherches en Management [DRM]
dc.contributor.authorFARJAUDON, Anne-Laure
dc.contributor.authorMORALES, Jeremy
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T14:18:26Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T14:18:26Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-01
dc.identifier.issn1045-2354en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00864761
dc.identifier.urioadoi:https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01630503/document
dc.identifier.urioadoi:https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01630503/file/aims2012_2588.pdf
dc.identifier.uriftccsdartic:oai:halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr:halshs-00864761
dc.identifier.urioai:researchgate.net:257466221
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/106537
dc.description.abstractEnThis article examines the role of accounting in the manufacture of consensus. Consensus building is often considered a central value for rational decision-making and management. However, more than a democratic confrontation of vantage points, the quest for consensus is a way to discourage conflict and resistance. Our main argument is that accounting and consensus play central roles in processes of definition and the social reproduction of dominant interests. Accounting acts to promote some stakes and strategies (and silence others), as if they were collective and disinterested, which makes them more powerful in debates that deny struggles and asymmetries in positions of power, as well as increases legitimacy by creating an illusion of participation. We illustrate these processes through a case study in which we document the intersection between two fields of knowledge, marketing and accounting, that compete for a monopoly on the definition of value and the ability to speak for the organisation. This analysis draws on Bourdieu's conceptualisation of symbolic domination to highlight how powerful actors secure influence while avoiding contestation. Accounting produces symbolic violence that consolidates asymmetries in positions of power by shaping what is consensual and what is not so that dominant interests are reproduced with the consent of those who have most to lose in the process.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourceoadoi_repo
dc.sourcebase
dc.sourceresearchgate
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subjectCritique
dc.subjectIntérêt public
dc.subjectCapital intellectuel
dc.subjectContrôle de gestion
dc.subject.enCritical
dc.subject.enPublic interest
dc.subject.enIntellectual capital
dc.subject.enManagement control
dc.subject.enSymbolic domination
dc.title.enIn Search of Consensus: The Role of Accounting in the Definition and Reproduction of Dominant Interests
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.010en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et managementen_US
bordeaux.journalCritical Perspectives On Accountingen_US
bordeaux.page154-171en_US
bordeaux.volume24en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesAuteurs affiliés externesen_US
bordeaux.issue2en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Critical%20Perspectives%20On%20Accounting&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154-171&rft.epage=154-171&rft.eissn=1045-2354&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.au=FARJAUDON,%20Anne-Laure&MORALES,%20Jeremy&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée