Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorTRON, L.
dc.contributor.authorBELOT, A.
dc.contributor.authorFAUVERNIER, M.
dc.contributor.authorREMONTET, L.
dc.contributor.authorBOSSARD, N.
dc.contributor.authorLAUNAY, L.
dc.contributor.authorBRYERE, J.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMONNEREAU, Alain
dc.contributor.authorDEJARDIN, O.
dc.contributor.authorLAUNOY, G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T09:34:30Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T09:34:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-15
dc.identifier.issn0020-7136en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/10483
dc.description.abstractEnSocial inequalities are concerning along the cancer continuum. In France, social gradient in health is particularly marked but little is known about social gradient in cancer survival. We aimed to investigate the influence of socioeconomic environment on cancer survival, for all cancers reported in the French Network of Cancer Registries. We analyzed 189,657 solid tumors diagnosed between 2006 and 2009, recorded in 18 registries. The European Deprivation Index (EDI), an ecological index measuring relative poverty in small geographic areas, assessed social environment. The EDI was categorized into quintiles of the national distribution. One- and five-year age-standardized net survival (ASNS) were estimated for each solid tumor site and deprivation quintile, among men and among women. We found that 5-year ASNS was lower among patients living in the most deprived areas compared to those living in the least deprived ones for 14/16 cancers among men and 16/18 cancers among women. The extent of cancer survival disparities according to deprivation varied substantially across the cancer sites. The reduction in ASNS between the least and the most deprived quintile reached 34% for liver cancer among men and 59% for bile duct cancer among women. For pancreas, stomach and esophagus cancer (among men), and ovary and stomach cancer (among women), deprivation gaps were larger at 1-year than 5-year survival. In conclusion, survival was worse in the most deprived areas for almost all cancers. Our results from population-based cancer registries data highlight the need for implementing actions to reduce social inequalities in cancer survival in France.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enEPICENE
dc.title.enSocioeconomic environment and disparities in cancer survival for 19 solid tumor sites: An analysis of the French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM) data
dc.title.alternativeInt J Canceren_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ijc.31951
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed30367459en_US
bordeaux.journalInternational journal of canceren_US
bordeaux.page1262-1274en_US
bordeaux.volume144en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue6en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03162362
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-03-08T13:42:09Z
hal.update-error.statusmetadataUpdate
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.date=2019-03-15&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1262-1274&rft.epage=1262-1274&rft.eissn=0020-7136&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.au=TRON,%20L.&BELOT,%20A.&FAUVERNIER,%20M.&REMONTET,%20L.&BOSSARD,%20N.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée