One-stage versus two-stage prosthesis replacement for prosthetic knee infections
| dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | RIBES, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | MASQUEFA, T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | DUTRONC, H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | DE SEYNES, C. | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| dc.contributor.author | DUPON, Michel | |
| dc.contributor.author | FABRE, T. | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| dc.contributor.author | DAUCHY, Frédéric-Antoine | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-10T10:08:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T10:08:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-10 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1769-6690 (Electronic) 0399-077X (Linking) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/10402 | |
| dc.description.abstractEn | INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic knee infection is a severe complication. Confirmed criteria are lacking to choose between one-stage or two-stage prosthesis replacement to treat the infection. The one-stage replacement could lead to a satisfactory control of the infection and to better functional results. METHOD: Retrospective study conducted between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014. The objectives of this study were to compare the infection outcome and functional results between the one-stage and two-stage replacement procedures. Functional results were evaluated using the IKS score, KOOS score, and SF-12 quality of life score. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent a two-stage replacement procedure and 21 patients a one-stage replacement. The average follow-up was 22 months after surgery. The infection was cured in 78% of patients who underwent a two-stage replacement and 90% of patients who underwent a one-stage replacement (P=0.3). The flexion range of motion was significantly better in the one-stage group than in the two-stage group (P=0.04). Results of the IKS score and of the KOOS score were better in the one-stage group. No difference was observed for the SF-12 score. CONCLUSION: The one-stage replacement procedure for periprosthetic knee infection was associated with a similar healing frequency as the two-stage replacement procedure, and with better knee function. | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
| dc.title.en | One-stage versus two-stage prosthesis replacement for prosthetic knee infections | |
| dc.title.alternative | Med Mal Infect | en_US |
| dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.medmal.2019.01.013 | en_US |
| dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 30795868 | en_US |
| bordeaux.journal | Medecine Et Maladies Infectieuses | en_US |
| bordeaux.page | 519-526 | en_US |
| bordeaux.volume | 49 | en_US |
| bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Bordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219 | en_US |
| bordeaux.issue | 7 | en_US |
| bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
| bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
| bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
| hal.identifier | hal-03210791 | |
| hal.version | 1 | |
| hal.date.transferred | 2021-04-28T08:34:51Z | |
| hal.export | true | |
| bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Medecine%20Et%20Maladies%20Infectieuses&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=519-526&rft.epage=519-526&rft.eissn=1769-6690%20(Electronic)%200399-077X%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1769-6690%20(Electronic)%200399-077X%20(Linking)&rft.au=RIBES,%20C.&MASQUEFA,%20T.&DUTRONC,%20H.&DE%20SEYNES,%20C.&DUPON,%20Michel&rft.genre=article |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||