Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorNAEL, Virginie
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMOREAU, Gwendoline
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMONFERME, Solene
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorCOUGNARD-GREGOIRE, Audrey
dc.contributor.authorSCHERLEN, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorARLEO, A.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorKOROBELNIK, Jean-Francois
ORCID: 0000-0002-4438-9535
IDREF: 028739272
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDELCOURT, Cecile
ORCID: 0000-0002-2099-0481
IDREF: 035105291
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorHELMER, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-03T13:44:50Z
dc.date.available2020-07-03T13:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifier.issn2168-6173 (Electronic) 2168-6165 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/8568
dc.description.abstractEnImportance: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is a common cause of visual impairment, but its prevalence in groups of older adults who could be pragmatic targets for improving optical correction remains unknown. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of URE in older adults, particularly in those with age-related eye disease and those who are unable to attend an outpatient clinic, and to identify the factors associated with URE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional analysis included 707 adults 78 years or older from the Alienor Study in Bordeaux, France. Data were collected from February 12, 2011, through December 21, 2012, and analyzed from November 1, 2017, through July 7, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Uncorrected refractive error was defined as the presenting distance visual acuity in the better-seeing eye improved by at least 5 letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart (>/=1 line on the logMAR chart) using the best-achieved optical correction. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine the factors associated with URE. Results: The study population of 707 adults 78 years or older (64.8% women; mean [SD] age, 84.3 [4.4] years) had a prevalence of URE of 38.8% (95% CI, 35.2%-42.5%). Prevalence was high for participants with eye disease (range, 35.0% [95% CI, 28.4%-42.0%] to 44.1% [95% CI, 27.2%-62.1%], depending on the disease) and those without eye disease (30.1%; 95% CI, 24.0%-36.7%). Prevalence was higher in participants who were examined at home (because they could not come to the clinic) than in those examined at the clinic (49.4% [95% CI, 42.8%-55.9%] vs 33.5% [95% CI, 29.2%-37.9%]; P < .001). Having an eye examination performed at home (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), living alone (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90), and having the perceptions that the ophthalmologist consultation fees are too expensive (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.36) and that declining visual acuity is normal with aging (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04-2.08) were all associated with URE. Conclusions and Relevance: These study results show that the prevalence of URE was high in this population and suggest that preventive strategies aimed at enhancing optical correction could be directed to all older adults and to specific groups by implementing at-home eye examinations for those who have difficulties attending an outpatient clinic and by focusing on those with eye disease who probably already have a regular ophthalmologic follow-up. More studies are needed to evaluate prevalence of URE in different populations and countries with various eye care systems.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enLEHA
dc.title.enPrevalence and Associated Factors of Uncorrected Refractive Error in Older Adults in a Population-Based Study in France
dc.title.alternativeJAMA Ophthalmolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4229en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed30326038en_US
bordeaux.journalJAMA ophthalmologyen_US
bordeaux.page3-11en_US
bordeaux.volume137en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=JAMA%20ophthalmology&amp;rft.date=2019-01-01&amp;rft.volume=137&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.spage=3-11&amp;rft.epage=3-11&amp;rft.eissn=2168-6173%20(Electronic)%202168-6165%20(Linking)&amp;rft.issn=2168-6173%20(Electronic)%202168-6165%20(Linking)&amp;rft.au=NAEL,%20Virginie&amp;MOREAU,%20Gwendoline&amp;MONFERME,%20Solene&amp;COUGNARD-GREGOIRE,%20Audrey&amp;SCHERLEN,%20A.%20C.&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée