On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining
| dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
| hal.structure.identifier | Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée [GREThA] | |
| dc.contributor.author | NAVARRO, Noemí | |
| dc.contributor.author | VESZTEG, Róbert F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-18T08:20:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-18T08:20:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-05-01 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0899-8256 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | oai:crossref.org:10.1016/j.geb.2020.01.003 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/7998 | |
| dc.description.abstractEn | We report experimental results and test axiomatic models of unstructured bargaining by checking the empirical relevance of the underlying axioms. Our data support strong efficiency, symmetry, independence of irrelevant alternatives and monotonicity, and reject scale invariance. Individual rationality and midpoint domination are violated by a significant fraction of agreements that implement equal division in highly unequal circumstances. Two well-known bargaining solutions that satisfy the confirmed properties explain the observed agreements reasonably well. The most frequent agreements in our sample are the ones suggested by the equal-division solution. In terms of the average Euclidean distance, the theoretical solution that best explains the data is the deal-me-out solution (Sutton, 1986; Binmore et al., 1989, Binmore et al., 1991). Popular solutions that satisfy scale invariance, individual rationality, and midpoint domination, as the well-known Nash or Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solutions, perform poorly in the laboratory. | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
| dc.source | crossref | |
| dc.subject.en | Bilateral bargaining | |
| dc.subject.en | Experiments | |
| dc.subject.en | Nash bargaining solution | |
| dc.subject.en | Equal-division solution | |
| dc.subject.en | Deal-me-out solution | |
| dc.subject.en | Individual rationality | |
| dc.subject.en | Scale invariance | |
| dc.title | On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining | |
| dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.geb.2020.01.003 | en_US |
| dc.subject.hal | Économie et finance quantitative [q-fin] | en_US |
| bordeaux.journal | Games and Economic Behavior | en_US |
| bordeaux.page | 117-145 | en_US |
| bordeaux.volume | 121 | en_US |
| bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA) - UMR 5113 | en_US |
| bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
| bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
| bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
| bordeaux.import.source | dissemin | |
| hal.identifier | hal-02873121 | |
| hal.version | 1 | |
| hal.date.transferred | 2020-06-18T08:20:14Z | |
| hal.export | true | |
| workflow.import.source | dissemin | |
| bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.title=On%20the%20empirical%20validity%20of%20axioms%20in%20unstructured%20bargaining&rft.atitle=On%20the%20empirical%20validity%20of%20axioms%20in%20unstructured%20bargaining&rft.jtitle=Games%20and%20Economic%20Behavior&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=117-145&rft.epage=117-145&rft.eissn=0899-8256&rft.issn=0899-8256&rft.au=NAVARRO,%20Noem%C3%AD&VESZTEG,%20R%C3%B3bert%20F.&rft.genre=article |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
| Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |
|||