Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
hal.structure.identifierMTB Recycling
dc.contributor.authorGRIMAUD, Guilhem
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorLARATTE, Bertrand
IDREF: 181621169
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorPERRY, Nicolas
IDREF: 085512125
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:49:09Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:49:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.conference2017-11-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/77179
dc.description.abstractEnThe circular economy offers a partial answer to resource depletion. Recycling is inherent in the circular economy strategies that why industrial companies look for stepping recycling rates up. But recycling approaches are often motivated by economic considerations. Yet the recycling paths are multiple and it is important to determine the best path according to different categories of indicators and not only profit.We worked with MTB, an engineering and manufacturing company of recycling equipment. Our work aims to determine which are the most relevant indicators to assess the sustainability performance of recycling processes. We selected 8 indicators in 3 different categories: technical, environmental and economic. The technical indicators are determined based on a common framework established using the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) protocol. Environmental and economic indicators results are given using a process Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) database. Information stored in the database using both variable and invariable unit process. The calculation is respectively done with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodologies. During the design phases, specific information is provided to establish the unit process performance of each recycling scenario.In this article, we present how the performance indicators were selected and calculated in regard with the decision support methodology build up.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAssociation of EcoDesign Societies, Japan
dc.source.titleGoing Green EcoDesign 2017
dc.subject.enLCA
dc.subject.enLCC
dc.subject.enRecycling
dc.subject.enPerformance Indicator
dc.subject.enEnvironmental Technology Verification
dc.title.enHow to Develop Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of Recycling Processes?
dc.typeCommunication dans un congrès avec actes
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement/Ingénierie de l'environnement
bordeaux.page6
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.countryTW
bordeaux.title.proceeding10th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing
bordeaux.conference.cityTainan
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-01696413
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-01696413v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.btitle=Going%20Green%20EcoDesign%202017&rft.date=2017&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=6&rft.au=GRIMAUD,%20Guilhem&LARATTE,%20Bertrand&PERRY,%20Nicolas&rft.genre=proceeding


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée