Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, Yi
dc.contributor.authorGRIMPLET, Jérôme
dc.contributor.authorDAVID, Karine
dc.contributor.authorCASTELLARIN, Simone Diego
dc.contributor.authorTEROL, Javier
dc.contributor.authorWONG, Darren C.J.
dc.contributor.authorLUO, Zhiwei
dc.contributor.authorSCHAFFER, Robert
dc.contributor.authorCELTON, Jean-Marc
dc.contributor.authorTALON, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCHERVIN, Christian
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorGAMBETTA, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-10T09:01:47Z
dc.date.available2020-04-10T09:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0168-9452en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/4213
dc.description.abstractEnFruits have been traditionally classified into two categories based on their capacity to produce and respond to ethylene during ripening. Fruits whose ripening is associated to a peak of ethylene production and a respiration burst are referred to as climacteric, while those that are not are referred to as non-climacteric. However, an increasing body of literature supports an important role for ethylene in the ripening of both climacteric and non-climacteric fruits. Genome and transcriptomic data have become available across a variety of fruits and we leverage these data to compare the structure and transcriptional regulation of the ethylene receptors and related proteins. Through the analysis of four economically important fruits, two climacteric (tomato and apple), and two non-climacteric (grape and citrus), this review compares the structure and transcriptional regulation of the ethylene receptors and related proteins in both types of fruit, establishing a basis for the annotation of ethylene-related genes. This analysis reveals two interesting differences between climacteric and non-climacteric fruit: i) a higher number of ETR genes are found in climacteric fruits, and ii) non-climacteric fruits are characterized by an earlier ETR expression peak relative to sugar accumulation.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subjectAnalyse phylogénétique
dc.subjectFruit climactérique
dc.subjectFruit non climactérique
dc.subjectTomate
dc.subjectPomme
dc.subjectRaisin
dc.subjectCitrus
dc.subjectÉthylène
dc.subject.enEthylene
dc.subject.enPerception
dc.subject.enPlant Hormone Signaling
dc.subject.enRipening
dc.subject.enClimacteric Fruit
dc.subject.enNon-Climacteric Fruit
dc.subject.enPhylogenetic Analysis
dc.subject.enRnaseq
dc.title.enEthylene receptors and related proteins in climacteric and non-climacteric fruits
dc.title.alternativePlant sci.en_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.07.012en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
bordeaux.journalPlant Scienceen_US
bordeaux.page63-72en_US
bordeaux.volume276en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne (EGFV) - UMR 1287en_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agroen_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-02539566
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2020-04-10T09:01:52Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Plant%20Science&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=276&rft.spage=63-72&rft.epage=63-72&rft.eissn=0168-9452&rft.issn=0168-9452&rft.au=CHEN,%20Yi&GRIMPLET,%20J%C3%A9r%C3%B4me&DAVID,%20Karine&CASTELLARIN,%20Simone%20Diego&TEROL,%20Javier&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée