Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKODJIKIAN, L.
dc.contributor.authorBAILLIF, S.
dc.contributor.authorCREUZOT-GARCHER, C.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDELYFER, Marie-Noelle
dc.contributor.authorMATONTI, F.
dc.contributor.authorWEBER, M.
dc.contributor.authorMATHIS, T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T13:25:11Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T13:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-07
dc.identifier.issn1999-4923 (Print) 1999-4923 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/26387
dc.description.abstractEnTo assess real-world outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed in order to identify publications assessing the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in DME in daily practice. Case reports and randomized controlled trials were excluded. Twenty-two observational real-world studies analyzing a total of 1880 eyes were included. Mean peak visual gain was +8.7 letters (11.3 months post-FAc injection) and was greater for lower baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and for more recent DME. Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased 34.3% from baseline. 77.0% of the analyzed studies reported both BCVA improvement of at least five letters and a CRT decrease by 20% or more. Rescue therapy was needed more frequently when FAc was administered for chronic DME. FAc-induced ocular hypertension was reported in 20.1% of patients but only 0.6% needed surgery. Cataract extraction was performed in 43.2% of phakic patients. Adequate patient selection is essential for optimal FAc response and better safety profile. Currently positioned as second- or third-line treatment in the management algorithm, FAc implant decreases treatment burden and provides better letter gain when administered for more recent DME.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.title.enReal-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
dc.title.alternativePharmaceuticsen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/pharmaceutics13010072en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed33430389en_US
bordeaux.journalPharmaceuticsen_US
bordeaux.volume13en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03154997
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-03-01T13:25:15Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutics&rft.date=2021-01-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.eissn=1999-4923%20(Print)%201999-4923%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1999-4923%20(Print)%201999-4923%20(Linking)&rft.au=KODJIKIAN,%20L.&BAILLIF,%20S.&CREUZOT-GARCHER,%20C.&DELYFER,%20Marie-Noelle&MATONTI,%20F.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée