Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCOLLONNAZ, M.
dc.contributor.authorERPELDING, M. L.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorALLA, Francois
dc.contributor.authorGOEHRINGER, F.
dc.contributor.authorDELAHAYE, F.
dc.contributor.authorIUNG, B.
dc.contributor.authorLE MOING, V.
dc.contributor.authorHOEN, B.
dc.contributor.authorSELTON-SUTY, C.
dc.contributor.authorAGRINIER, N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T13:05:41Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T13:05:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.issn1873-2585 (Electronic) 1047-2797 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/26382
dc.description.abstractEnPURPOSE: Prognostic studies derived from samples of patients managed in tertiary hospitals are subject to referral bias. We aimed to characterise this bias using the example of infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: We analysed data from a French population-based cohort which included 497 patients with IE in 2008. Patients were admitted directly to a tertiary hospital (group T), or admitted to a non-tertiary hospital and referred to a tertiary hospital (group NTT) or not (group NT). We compared patients' characteristics and survival rates and prognostic factors between groups. RESULTS: Compared to group T (N=291), NTT patients (N=144) were more often males (81.3% vs 72.5%, p=0.046), injection drug users (9.7% vs 4.5%, p=0.033), had more frequent surgical indications (78.5% vs 64.3%, p=0.003). Compared to group NT (N=62), NTT patients were more often males (81.3% vs 67.7%, p=0.034) and had surgical indications more often (78.5% vs 19.4%, p<0.001). One-year survival was higher in (NTT+T) patients than in NT patients (73.0% vs 56.1%, p=0.01). Prognostic factors as well as HR estimates varied across groups. CONCLUSION: When derived from samples mixing patients admitted directly and those referred to tertiary hospitals, validity of characteristics description, survival estimates, and HRs is threatened by referral bias.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enImpact of referral bias on prognostic studies outcomes: insights from a population-based cohort study on infective endocarditis
dc.title.alternativeAnn Epidemiolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.09.008en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed32950657en_US
bordeaux.journalAnnals of Epidemiologyen_US
bordeaux.page29-37en_US
bordeaux.volume54en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamMRISPen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03154956
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-03-01T13:05:46Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20Epidemiology&amp;rft.date=2021-02&amp;rft.volume=54&amp;rft.spage=29-37&amp;rft.epage=29-37&amp;rft.eissn=1873-2585%20(Electronic)%201047-2797%20(Linking)&amp;rft.issn=1873-2585%20(Electronic)%201047-2797%20(Linking)&amp;rft.au=COLLONNAZ,%20M.&amp;ERPELDING,%20M.%20L.&amp;ALLA,%20Francois&amp;GOEHRINGER,%20F.&amp;DELAHAYE,%20F.&amp;rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem