Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorGANCEL, Anne-Laure
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorJOURDES, Michael
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorPONS, Alexandre
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorTEISSEDRE, Pierre Louis
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-29T09:48:29Z
dc.date.available2024-04-29T09:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-10
dc.identifier.issn2494-1271en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/199362
dc.description.abstractEnDuring bottling aging, the wine comes into contact with the cork stopper due to the horizontal position of the bottle. The release of compounds, such as cork phenolic compounds, thus take place between the cork and the wine, depending on the type of cork stopper and the surface treatments applied. Many publications describe the extraction of these phenolic compounds in wine or hydroalcoholic solutions from natural corks, but few address microagglomerated corks, which are increasingly used by winemakers to seal their bottles. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the polyphenols, mainly hydrolysable tannins, transferred from natural and microagglomerated corks treated with supercritical CO2 into hydroalcoholic solutions. For this purpose, polyphenols released in macerates of natural and microagglomerated cork stoppers were identified and quantified by HPLC-DAD-ESI-QQQ. Suberic acid was also quantified. In this study, despite the high intra-“natural cork stopper” variability, significant differences were found between both types of stoppers for all polyphenols, the agglomerated corks releasing significantly less polyphenols; i.e., 25 times less. In contrast, suberic acid was extracted from both types of corks in similar concentrations; therefore, its extractability was not impacted by the type of stopper. A sensory profile was also carried out on the macerates. Macerates of natural cork stoppers were perceived with notes of “cardboard, dust, plank, wood” and “cork taint” significantly higher than supercritical CO2 treated microagglomerated cork stopper macerates. Moreover, the natural cork macerate with the highest content in polyphenol was perceived as being more bitter than that of microagglomerated cork stoppers.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enNatural cork stoppers
dc.subject.enMicroagglomerated cork stoppers
dc.subject.enPolyphenols
dc.subject.enEllagitannins
dc.subject.enSuberic acid
dc.subject.enSensory impact
dc.subject.enAging
dc.title.enMigration of polyphenols from natural and microagglomerated cork stoppers to hydroalcoholic solutions and their sensory impact
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.7393en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
bordeaux.journalOeno Oneen_US
bordeaux.page13-26en_US
bordeaux.volume57en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesOenologie - UMR 1366en_US
bordeaux.issue3en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04562560
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-04-29T09:48:32Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Oeno%20One&rft.date=2023-07-10&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=13-26&rft.epage=13-26&rft.eissn=2494-1271&rft.issn=2494-1271&rft.au=GANCEL,%20Anne-Laure&JOURDES,%20Michael&PONS,%20Alexandre&TEISSEDRE,%20Pierre%20Louis&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée