Past decade above-ground biomass change comparisons from four multi-temporal global maps
Language
en
Article de revue
This item was published in
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2023-04-04, vol. 118, p. 103274
Elsevier
English Abstract
consistently captured AGB losses in known deforestation hotspots. The comparisons also identified several carbon sink regions consistently detected by all maps. However, disagreement between maps is still large in key ...Read more >
consistently captured AGB losses in known deforestation hotspots. The comparisons also identified several carbon sink regions consistently detected by all maps. However, disagreement between maps is still large in key forest regions such as the Amazon basin. The overall ΔAGB map cross-correlation between maps varied in the range 0.11-0.29 (r). Reported ΔAGB magnitudes were largest in the high-resolution datasets including the CCI map differencing (stock change) and Flux model (gain-loss) methods, while they were smallest according to the coarser-resolution LVOD and JPL time series products, especially for AGB gains. Our results suggest that ΔAGB assessed from current maps can be biased and any use of the estimates should take that into account. Currently, ΔAGB reference data are sparse especially in the tropics but that deficit can be alleviated by upcoming LiDAR data networks in the context of Supersites and GEO-Trees.Read less <
English Keywords
Above-ground biomass
Above-ground biomass change
Carbon flux
Map assessment
Global carbon cycle
Earth observation
Origin
Hal imported