Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGAMMAL, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorJÄRNSTRÖM, Marie
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorBERNARD, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorNORKKO, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorNORKKO, Alf
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T13:44:54Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T13:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifier.issn1432-9840en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1007/s10021-018-0258-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/189027
dc.description.abstractThe ongoing loss of biodiversity and global environmental changes severely affect the structure of coastal ecosystems. Consequences, in terms of ecosystem functioning, are, however, difficult to predict because the context dependency of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships within these heterogeneous seascapes is poorly understood. To assess the effects of biological and environmental factors in mediating ecosystem functioning (nutrient cycling) in different natural habitats, intact sediment cores were collected at 18 sites on a grain size gradient from coarse sand to silt, with varying organic matter content and vegetation. To assess ecosystem functioning, solute fluxes (O2, NH4+, PO43−, Si) across the sediment–water interface were measured. The macrofaunal communities changed along the grain size gradient with higher abundance, biomass and number of species in coarser sediments and in habitats with more vegetation. Across the whole gradient, the macrofauna cumulatively accounted for 25% of the variability in the multivariate solute fluxes, whereas environmental variables cumulatively accounted for 20%. Only the biomass and abundance of a few of the most dominant macrofauna species, not the number of species, appeared to contribute significantly to the nutrient recycling processes. Closer analyses of different sediment types (grouped into coarse, medium and fine sediment) showed that the macrofauna was an important predictor in all sediment types, but had the largest impact in fine and medium sediments. The results imply that even if the ecosystem functioning is similar in different sediment types, the underpinning mechanisms are different, which makes it challenging to generalize patterns of functioning across the heterogeneous shallow coastal zones.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.title.enEnvironmental Context Mediates Biodiversity–Ecosystem Functioning Relationships in Coastal Soft-sediment Habitats
dc.title.alternativeEcosystemsen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10021-018-0258-9en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement/Biodiversité et Ecologieen_US
bordeaux.journalEcosystemsen_US
bordeaux.page137-151en_US
bordeaux.volume22en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEPOC : Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux - UMR 5805en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.teamECOBIOCen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-04523474
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-03-27T13:44:55Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137-151&rft.epage=137-151&rft.eissn=1432-9840&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.au=GAMMAL,%20Johanna&J%C3%84RNSTR%C3%96M,%20Marie&BERNARD,%20Guillaume&NORKKO,%20Joanna&NORKKO,%20Alf&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée