Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorROWLAND, Freya E
dc.contributor.authorPRATS, Kyra A
dc.contributor.authorALSHWAIRIKH, Yara A
dc.contributor.authorBURAK, Mary K
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorFANTON, Ana Clara
dc.contributor.authorDUGUID, Marlyse C
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T14:42:03Z
dc.date.available2024-02-12T14:42:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/188052
dc.description.abstractEnPublishing is a strong determinant of academic success and there is compelling evidence that identity may influence the academic writing experience and writing output. However, studies rarely quantitatively assess the effects of major life upheavals on trainee writing. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unprecedented life disruptions that may have disproportionately impacted different demographics of trainees. We analyzed anonymous survey responses from 342 North American environmental biology graduate students and postdoctoral scholars (hereafter trainees) about scientific writing experiences to assess: (1) how identity interacts with scholarly publication totals and (2) how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced trainee perceptions of scholarly writing productivity and whether there were differences among identities. Interestingly, identity had a strong influence on publication totals, but it differed by career stage with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars often having opposite results. We found that trainees identifying as female and those with chronic health conditions or disabilities lag in publication output at some point during training. Additionally, although trainees felt they had more time during the pandemic to write, they reported less productivity and motivation. Trainees who identified as female; Black, Indigenous, or as a Person of Color [BIPOC]; and as first-generation college graduates were much more likely to indicate that the pandemic affected their writing. Disparities in the pandemic’s impact on writing were most pronounced for BIPOC respondents; a striking 85% of BIPOC trainees reported that the pandemic affected their writing habits, and overwhelmingly felt unproductive and unmotivated to write. Our results suggest that the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on writing output may only heighten the negative effects commonly reported amongst historically excluded trainees. Based on our findings, we encourage the academy to consider how an overemphasis on publication output during hiring may affect historically excluded groups in STEM—especially in a post-COVID-19 era.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.title.enOveremphasis on publications may disadvantage historically excluded groups in STEM before and during COVID-19: A North American survey-based study
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0291124en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
bordeaux.journalPLoS ONEen_US
bordeaux.pagee0291124en_US
bordeaux.volume18en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne (EGFV) - UMR 1287en_US
bordeaux.issue9en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agroen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20ONE&rft.date=2023-09-27&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0291124&rft.epage=e0291124&rft.au=ROWLAND,%20Freya%20E&PRATS,%20Kyra%20A&ALSHWAIRIKH,%20Yara%20A&BURAK,%20Mary%20K&FANTON,%20Ana%20Clara&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record