Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLANKESTER, Lucie-Anna
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorALEXOPOULOS, Theodore
ORCID: 0000-0001-8281-6449
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T13:09:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T13:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-20
dc.identifier.issn2397-8570en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/187816
dc.description.abstractEnBlack Lives Matter (BLM) has gained momentum in its fight against racism cross-nationally. Yet, there are conflicting opinions on BLM. To account for this, previous research relied on cross-national predictors (e.g., Social Dominance Orientation; SDO). However, BLM support needs to be examined via the prism of national contexts and their peculiarities. Here, we claim that nationally-grounded determinants (next to cross-national ones) shape BLM (dis-)approval. Based on national identity construal, we argue that the way individuals identify with it predicts BLM support. Further, we expect this relationship to be mediated by personal endorsement of national beliefs about diversity. This claim was tested in a French ecological context, where: 1) national identity is based on a straitened view of diversity and 2) diversity issues are regulated via two antagonistic cultural norms: one is egalitarian (i.e., Historic Laïcité) and the other is assimilationist (i.e., New Laïcité). In two pre-registered and well-powered studies (Study 1, N = 305; Study 2, N = 489), we anticipated and found that National Identification negatively predicts BLM support. Crucially, cultural norm endorsements dually-mediated this relationship, suggesting their instrumental function in BLM support. We considered, via path analysis, an additional pathway involving SDO. We found that nationally-grounded and cross-national paths operate jointly to shape BLM support. We replicated these results one year later, providing support for our model. These findings are of relevance beyond the French context as they contribute to an emerging literature examining how intra- and inter-national forces shape, in tandem, diversity responses.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enBlack Lives Matter
dc.subject.enLaïcité
dc.subject.enCultural norms of diversity
dc.subject.enNational identification
dc.subject.enSocial dominance orientation
dc.title.enBlack Lives Matter… but to Whom? An Examination of Nationally-Grounded Determinants of Black Lives Matter Support
dc.title.alternativeInt. Rev. Soc. Psychol.en_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/irsp.824en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société / Psychologieen_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologie
bordeaux.journalInternational Review of Social Psychologyen_US
bordeaux.page16en_US
bordeaux.volume36en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04564613
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-04-30T14:54:52Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20Review%20of%20Social%20Psychology&rft.date=2023-11-20&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.eissn=2397-8570&rft.issn=2397-8570&rft.au=LANKESTER,%20Lucie-Anna&ALEXOPOULOS,%20Theodore&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée