Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorCACCIAMANI, Federica
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBERCU, Ariane
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBOUTELOUP, Vincent
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorGRASSET, Leslie
hal.structure.identifierInstitut des Maladies Neurodégénératives [Bordeaux] [IMN]
dc.contributor.authorPLANCHE, Vincent
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorCHENE, Genevieve
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDUFOUIL, Carole
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T09:29:43Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T09:29:43Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-22
dc.identifier.issn1758-9193en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/186999
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: Cognitive complaints are often regarded as an early sign of Alzheimer's disease (AD) but may also occur in several other conditions and contexts. This study examines the correlates of cognitive complaint trajectories over a 5-year period in individuals who shared similar objective cognitive trajectories. METHODS: We analyzed a subsample (n = 1748) of the MEMENTO cohort, consisting of individuals with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Participants were stratified based on their latent MMSE trajectory over a 5-year period: "high and increasing," "subtle decline," and "steep decline." Within each of the three strata, we used a latent-class longitudinal approach to identify distinct trajectories of cognitive complaints. We then used multiple logistic regressions to examine the association between these complaint trajectories and several factors, including AD biomarkers (blood pTau/Aβ42 ratio, cortical thickness, APOE genotype), anxiety, depression, social relationships, a comorbidity-polypharmacy score, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Among participants with high and increasing MMSE scores, greater baseline comorbidity-polypharmacy scores (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, adjusted p = 0.03) were associated with higher odds of moderate and increasing cognitive complaints (as opposed to mild and decreasing complaints). Baseline depression and social relationships also showed significant associations with the complaint pattern but did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. Among participants with subtle decline in MMSE scores, greater baseline depression (OR = 1.76, adjusted p = 0.02) was associated with higher odds of moderate and increasing cognitive complaints (versus mild and decreasing). Similarly, baseline comorbidity-polypharmacy scores and pTau/Aβ(42) ratio exhibited significant associations, but they did not survive correction. Among participants with a steep decline in MMSE scores, greater baseline comorbidity-polypharmacy scores increased the odds of moderate complaints (versus mild, OR = 1.38, unadjusted p = 0.03, adjusted p = 0.32), but this effect did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar objective cognitive trajectory, there is heterogeneity in the subjective perception of these cognitive changes. This perception was explained by both AD-related and, more robustly, non-AD-related factors. These findings deepen our understanding of the multifaceted nature of subjective cognitive complaints in individuals at risk for dementia and underscore the importance of considering a range of factors when interpreting cognitive complaints.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.title.enUnderstanding factors associated with the trajectory of subjective cognitive complaints in groups with similar objective cognitive trajectories
dc.title.alternativeAlzheimers Res Theren_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13195-023-01348-wen_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed37993894en_US
bordeaux.journalAlzheimer's research & therapyen_US
bordeaux.page205en_US
bordeaux.volume15en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.teamPHARES_BPHen_US
bordeaux.teamBIOSTAT_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDFondation Plan Alzheimeren_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDGE Healthcareen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDFujirebio Europeen_US
hal.identifierhal-04384371
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-01-10T09:29:46Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20research%20&%20therapy&rft.date=2023-11-22&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=205&rft.eissn=1758-9193&rft.issn=1758-9193&rft.au=CACCIAMANI,%20Federica&BERCU,%20Ariane&BOUTELOUP,%20Vincent&GRASSET,%20Leslie&PLANCHE,%20Vincent&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée