Afficher la notice abrégée

Survival after breast cancer according to participation in organised or opportunistic screening and deprivation

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorPOISEUIL, Marie
dc.contributor.authorPAYET, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMOLINIE, Florence
dc.contributor.authorDABAKUYO-YONLI, Tienhan Sandrine
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMATHOULIN-PELISSIER, Simone
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorAMADEO, Brice
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorCOUREAU, Gaelle
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T13:06:20Z
dc.date.available2023-02-20T13:06:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.issn1877-783X (Electronic) 1877-7821 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/171999
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: Many studies have investigated the survival of women by comparing those who participated in organised screening with those who did not. However, among those who do not participate in organised screening, some women undergo opportunistic screening, but these women remain difficult to identify, particularly in France. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify opportunistic screening, and then to study survival after breast cancer separately according to participation in organised, opportunistic or no screening, and taking into account sociodemographic inequalities. METHODS: The study population was identified from 3 French cancer registries, whose data was crossed with the screening coordination centers and the National Health Data System to identify the different type of screening. The European Deprivation Index was used to define the level of deprivation. We estimated net survival using the Pohar-Perme method. RESULTS: The 5-year net survival probabilities were higher for women who attended organised screening (97.0 %) than for women with opportunistic screening (94.1 %) or non-attenders (78.1 %). According to the level of deprivation, a significant difference was observed between the groups of women screened by organised and opportunistic screening, compared to the non-attenders. CONCLUSION: The identification of opportunistic screening is an important element in identifying women who do not screening. It enables to us to see that women who do not attend any screening have a much higher loss-of-opportunity in terms of survival than those who participate in organised or opportunistic screening, and even more so in the most deprived areas.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enSurvival after breast cancer according to participation in organised or opportunistic screening and deprivation
dc.title.alternativeCancer Epidemiolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.canep.2022.102312en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36508966en_US
bordeaux.journalCancer Epidemiologyen_US
bordeaux.volume82en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03997117
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-02-20T13:06:33Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20Epidemiology&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=82&rft.eissn=1877-783X%20(Electronic)%201877-7821%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1877-783X%20(Electronic)%201877-7821%20(Linking)&rft.au=POISEUIL,%20Marie&PAYET,%20Catherine&MOLINIE,%20Florence&DABAKUYO-YONLI,%20Tienhan%20Sandrine&MATHOULIN-PELISSIER,%20Simone&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée