Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBiologie des maladies cardiovasculaires = Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases
dc.contributor.authorBELLO, Maeva
dc.contributor.authorOGER, Sébastien
dc.contributor.authorBEDON-CARTE, Sandrine
dc.contributor.authorVIELSTADTE, Chloée
dc.contributor.authorLEO, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorZAOUTER, Cédrick
hal.structure.identifierBiologie des maladies cardiovasculaires = Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases
dc.contributor.authorOUATTARA, Alexandre
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T12:05:07Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T12:05:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-01
dc.identifier.issn2352-5568en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/171671
dc.description.abstractEnPatients undergoing thoracic surgery are at risk of severe postoperative pain. Post-thoracotomy pain relief is usually provided with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). Intraoperative use of opioids may result in hyperalgesia and increase analgesics consumption. We investigated the effect of opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) on epidural ropivacaine requirement after thoracotomy. This retrospective study compared postoperative epidural ropivacaine requirement of patients undergoing open thoracotomy and receiving either opioid-based anaesthesia (OBA group) or a non-opioid regimen including clonidine, ketamine and lidocaine (OFA group). All patients received postoperative multimodal analgesia including both epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesics. The primary outcome was the cumulative first 48 postoperative hours epidural ropivacaine consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, requirement for postoperative morphine titration, total opioid analgesics consumption within the first 48 postoperative hours, incidence of nausea and vomiting, intraoperative haemodynamic. From January 2015 to February 2018, 50 patients received an OBA and 25 received an OFA. The cumulative first 48 postoperative hours epidural ropivacaine consumption was significantly higher in the OBA-group (919 ± 311 mg versus 693 ± 270 mg, P = 0.002). Numerical Rating Scale at 6 and 24 h were significantly lower in the OFA-group (1[0-2] versus 3 [1-5], P = 0.0005 and 1[0-2] versus 3.5 [1-5], P = 0.001). In post-anaesthesia care unit, the proportion of patients requiring morphine was significantly higher in the OBA-group (42% versus 4%, P < 0.001). During anaesthesia, the OBA-group required more vasopressor support, while there were more hypertensive events in the OFA-group. OFA might reduce ropivacaine consumption, early postoperative pain scores and requirement for morphine titration after thoracotomy.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enAged
dc.subject.enAnalgesia
dc.subject.enEpidural
dc.subject.enAnalgesics
dc.subject.enNon-Narcotic
dc.subject.enAnalgesics
dc.subject.enOpioid
dc.subject.enAnesthetics
dc.subject.enLocal
dc.subject.enCase-Control Studies
dc.subject.enClonidine
dc.subject.enFemale
dc.subject.enHumans
dc.subject.enInjections
dc.subject.enIntravenous
dc.subject.enKetamine
dc.subject.enLidocaine
dc.subject.enMale
dc.subject.enMiddle Aged
dc.subject.enMorphine
dc.subject.enPain
dc.subject.enPostoperative
dc.subject.enRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.enRopivacaine
dc.subject.enThoracic Surgical Procedures
dc.subject.enThoracotomy
dc.subject.enTime Factors
dc.title.enEffect of opioid-free anaesthesia on postoperative epidural ropivacaine requirement after thoracic surgery: A retrospective unmatched case-control study.
dc.title.alternativeAnaesth Crit Care Pain Meden_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.accpm.2019.01.013en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Médecine humaine et pathologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed30731138en_US
bordeaux.journalAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicineen_US
bordeaux.page499-505en_US
bordeaux.volume38en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBiologie des maladies cardiovasculaires (BMC) - UMR 1034en_US
bordeaux.issue5en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcepubmed
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcepubmed
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20Critical%20Care%20&%20Pain%20Medicine&amp;rft.date=2019-10-01&amp;rft.volume=38&amp;rft.issue=5&amp;rft.spage=499-505&amp;rft.epage=499-505&amp;rft.eissn=2352-5568&amp;rft.issn=2352-5568&amp;rft.au=BELLO,%20Maeva&amp;OGER,%20S%C3%A9bastien&amp;BEDON-CARTE,%20Sandrine&amp;VIELSTADTE,%20Chlo%C3%A9e&amp;LEO,%20Francesco&amp;rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record