Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDAOUD-PINEAU, Frederic
hal.structure.identifierMicrobiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité [MFP]
dc.contributor.authorM'ZALI, Fatima
hal.structure.identifierMicrobiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité [MFP]
dc.contributor.authorZABALA, Arnaud
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMOORE, Nicholas
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorROGUES, Anne-Marie
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-31T13:17:30Z
dc.date.available2022-10-31T13:17:30Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-03
dc.identifier.issn2079-6382 (Print) 2079-6382 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/170174
dc.description.abstractEn(1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-susceptible microorganisms common in surgical site infections (SSIs) and a segment of each TS. Microbial concentrations were measured at T0, T4, T8 and T24 h. Similar non-triclosan sutures (NTS) were used as controls. Microbial concentrations were plotted and analysed with panel analysis. They were predicted over time with a double-exponential model and four parameters fitted to each TS × microorganism combination. (3) Results: The microbial concentration was associated with the triclosan presence, timeslot and microorganism. It was not associated with the suture material. All combinations shared a common pattern with an early steep concentration reduction from baseline to 4-8 h, followed by a concentration up to a 24-h plateau in most cases with a mild concentration increase. (4) Conclusions: Microorganisms seem to be predominantly killed by contact or near-contact killing with the suture rather than the triclosan concentration in the culture medium. No significant in vitro antimicrobial pharmacodynamic difference between the three TS is identified. Triclosan can reduce the suture microbial colonisation and SSI risk.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enSuture
dc.subject.enAntimicrobial
dc.subject.enPharmacodynamics
dc.subject.enTriclosan
dc.subject.enSurgical site infection
dc.subject.enTime-kill
dc.subject.enContact killing
dc.subject.enTranslational modelling
dc.title.enDo Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/antibiotics11091195en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36139974en_US
bordeaux.journalAntibioticsen_US
bordeaux.volume11en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue9en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.teamAHEAD_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
hal.identifierhal-03835178
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2022-10-31T13:17:34Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Antibiotics&rft.date=2022-09-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.eissn=2079-6382%20(Print)%202079-6382%20(Linking)&rft.issn=2079-6382%20(Print)%202079-6382%20(Linking)&rft.au=DAOUD-PINEAU,%20Frederic&M'ZALI,%20Fatima&ZABALA,%20Arnaud&MOORE,%20Nicholas&ROGUES,%20Anne-Marie&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée