Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
TAYEH, Christine
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]
Laboratoire de santé des végétaux [LSV Angers]
See more >
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]
Laboratoire de santé des végétaux [LSV Angers]
TAYEH, Christine
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]
Laboratoire de santé des végétaux [LSV Angers]
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]
Laboratoire de santé des végétaux [LSV Angers]
GACHET, Emmanuel
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]
Laboratoire de santé des végétaux [LSV Angers]
< Reduce
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]
Laboratoire de santé des végétaux [LSV Angers]
Language
en
Article de revue
This item was published in
EFSA Journal. 2022, vol. 20, n° 1, p. e07025
European Food Safety Authority
English Abstract
Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non-regulated pests ...Read more >
Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non-regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literature. The ranking methodology proposed at the end of the pilot phase was based on the scoring of pests under evaluation following 16 criteria related to the steps of the pest risk assessment scheme. The multicriteria matrix of scores obtained was then submitted to the multicriteria analysis method PROMETHEE. The pilot methodology was tested on a limited number of pests (14 pests identified during the monitoring activity, and 4 'control' pests whose well-known risk should be reflected either in a positive or negative score), then applied on all non-regulated pests identified through the media and scientific literature monitoring in the first 2 years of the project. After having collected feedback from the targeted final users (EU risk managers), the methodology underwent a few refinements: (i) implementation of the methodology to a set of already assessed reference pests from EFSA opinions, (ii) exclusions of three criteria from the scoring phase, (iii) identification of pests proposed for further action ('positive' pests), using a threshold defined after scoring the reference pests.Read less <
English Keywords
multicriteria decision‐aiding method
pest ranking
pest risk analysis
pest scoring
plant health
multicriteria decision-aiding method
pest risk analysis European Commission
Directorate General for Health and Food Safety
Origin
Hal importedCollections