Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierCentre Émile Durkheim [CED]
dc.contributor.authorBEDOCK, Camille
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractEnEmpirical political science has increasingly focused on citizens' conceptions of their political system. Most existing studies draw upon large quantitative datasets which have produced contradictory results. Qualitative approaches are used more and more commonly to identify the general narrative produced by ordinary citizens on their political system, but they tend to underplay the variations found in their discourses. In this article, I use semi-directed interviews to explore citizens' contrasting aspirations about their political system. This article is based on 32 interviews conducted with French citizens across Fall and Winter 2017 and on 24 interviews conducted during the Yellow Vests movement in fall 2019. During these interviews, citizens were asked to define in their own terms what politics is, what it should achieve, what the flaws and advantages of their political system are and what should be changed. These citizens have produced four ideal-typical discourses, uncovering four distinct conceptions of what the political system is, how it legitimizes itself, what types of procedures it should lay on and what types of outcomes it should produce. Citizens' discourses heavily focus on alternative logics of political representation, which remains unavoidable to channel political decisions. They express four competing aspirations: entrustment, participation, identification, and control & sanction. The two latter conceptions remain under-explored empirically.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/
dc.subject.enpolitical system
dc.subject.endemocracy
dc.subject.encitizens
dc.subject.enrepresentation
dc.subject.enparticipation
dc.subject.encontrol
dc.subject.enidentification
dc.title.enCitizens' contrasting aspirations about their political system: entrustment, participation, identification and control
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpos.2020.563351
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
bordeaux.journalFrontiers in Political Science
bordeaux.page563351
bordeaux.volume2
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhalshs-02933088
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//halshs-02933088v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20Political%20Science&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=563351&rft.epage=563351&rft.au=BEDOCK,%20Camille&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record