COSTA, Olivier; STAVRIDIS, Stelios; DRI FRANZOI, Clarissa

doi:10.1057/9781137322746_12

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

COSTA, Olivier
Centre Émile Durkheim [CED]

STAVRIDIS, Stelios
Research Unit on Global Governance and the European Union

DRI FRANZOI, Clarissa
Centre Émile Durkheim [CED]

Langue

Chapitre d'ouvrage

Ce document a été publié dans

Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization: The Role of Inter-Parliamentary Institutions, Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization: The Role of Inter-Parliamentary Institutions. 2013p. 231-244

Palgrave Macmillan

Résumé en anglais

This book has no pretention to propose a new typology of International Parliamentary Institutions (IPIs). As we have seen in the introduction, many authors have elaborated such typologies. They are very interesting and a useful tool for analysis, but every exercise of classification has its own limitations: it implies choices that highlight some aspects of the cases under study (name, structure, membership, competences etc.), and necessarily hide others. We also consider that the phenomenon of IPI is still too new and evolutionary to propose a definitive classification. In that respect, it is interesting to note that academic research has an impact on institutional practices: it has already contributed to clarifying a bit the landscape of IPIs, and will continue to do so, since actors of IPIs are curious about other experiences in the field of parliamentary integration and about academic work on that question.< Réduire

Mots clés en anglais

European Union

Regional Integration

European Parliament

Civil Society Actor

National Parliament

Métadonnées

Licence d’utilisation du document

Conclusions

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

Mots clés en anglais

DOI

Origine

Unités de recherche