Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierUniversité libre de Bruxelles [ULB]
dc.contributor.authorORSINI, Amandine
hal.structure.identifierCentre Émile Durkheim [CED]
dc.contributor.authorCOMPAGNON, Daniel
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1946-0171
dc.description.abstractEnMainstream literature in international relations understands negotiations in terms of power politics and/or bargaining processes between rival national interests to account for states' negotiating stands. Using definitions and questions initially defined by Thomas Risse, this study of processes at work in the biodiversity regime underlines instead their deliberative dimension and its contribution to positive negotiation outcomes. However, the article also challenges the dominant understanding of deliberation in global environmental politics that focuses on the participation of non-governmental organizations and other interest groups in the 'public space'. Instead it identifies deliberative elements in the negotiation process proper, stressing in particular the importance of the relationships developed between governmental delegations through series of closed meetings of selected participants. This contribution uses for illustration the negotiations leading to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.subject.endeliberation
dc.subject.eninternational negotiations
dc.subject.enbiodiversity
dc.subject.enNGOs
dc.subject.enbiosafety
dc.subject.enaccess and benefit sharing
dc.title.enFrom Logics to Procedures : Arguing within International Environmental Negociations
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19460171.2012.752970
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Sociologie
bordeaux.journalCritical Policy Studies
bordeaux.page273-291
bordeaux.volume7
bordeaux.issue3
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhalshs-00936647
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//halshs-00936647v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Critical%20Policy%20Studies&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273-291&rft.epage=273-291&rft.eissn=1946-0171&rft.issn=1946-0171&rft.au=ORSINI,%20Amandine&COMPAGNON,%20Daniel&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée