Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorMESNARD, Michel
IDREF: 10601417X
dc.contributor.authorRAMOS, Antonio
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorBALLU, Alex
IDREF: 106013637
dc.contributor.authorMORLIER, Julien
IDREF: 171569334
dc.contributor.authorCID, M.
dc.contributor.authorSIMOES, J. A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T14:35:20Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T14:35:20Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-01
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.019
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158448
dc.description.abstractEnPurpose Prosthetic materials and bone present quite different mechanical properties. Consequently, mandible reconstruction with metallic materials (or a mandible condyle implant) modifies the physiologic behavior of the mandible (stress, strain patterns, and condyle displacements). The changing of bone strain distribution results in an adaptation of the temporomandibular joint, including articular contacts. Materials and Methods Using a validated finite element model, the natural mandible strains and condyle displacements were evaluated. Modifications of strains and displacements were then assessed for 2 different temporomandibular joint implants. Because materials and geometry play important key roles, mechanical properties of cortical bone were taken into account in models used in finite element analysis. Results The finite element model allowed verification of the worst loading configuration of the mandibular condyle. Replacing the natural condyle by 1 of the 2 tested implants, the results also show the importance of the implant geometry concerning biomechanical mandibular behavior. The implant geometry and stiffness influenced mainly strain distribution. Conclusion The different forces applied to the mandible by the elevator muscles, teeth, and joint loads indicate that the finite element model is a relevant tool to optimize implant geometry or, in a subsequent study, to choose a more suitable distribution of the screws. Bone screws (number and position) have a significant influence on mandibular behavior and on implant stress pattern. Stress concentration and implant fracture must be avoided.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.title.enBiomechanical Analysis Comparing Natural and Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Using a Finite Element Model
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.019en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Matériauxen_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
bordeaux.page1008-1017en_US
bordeaux.volume69en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiersen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-03812450
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2022-10-12T14:35:24Z
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Oral%20and%20Maxillofacial%20Surgery&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1008-1017&rft.epage=1008-1017&rft.eissn=0278-2391&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.au=MESNARD,%20Michel&RAMOS,%20Antonio&BALLU,%20Alex&MORLIER,%20Julien&CID,%20M.&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem