DELZON, Sylvain; COCHARD, Hervé; PFAUTSCH, Sebastian

doi:10.20870/jph.2016.e009

Metadatos

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Licencia de uso del documento

DELZON, Sylvain
Biodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]

COCHARD, Hervé
Laboratoire de Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre Fruitier et Forestier [PIAF]

PFAUTSCH, Sebastian
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment [Richmond] [HIE]

Idioma

Article de revue

Este ítem está publicado en

Journal of Plant Hydraulics. 2016, vol. 3, n° e-009, p. e009

INRA Science and Impact

Resumen en inglés

Funders, institutions and journals should challenge the tyranny of metrics. Editors of international scientific journals find it more and more difficult to locate reviewers that are willing to evaluate manuscripts prior to publication (called ‘peer-review’). The most experienced researchers, best qualified to undertake these evaluations, increasingly decline peer-review requests, either because they do not have time or because they have reviewed so many manuscripts that they have become weary of the task. As a result, editors often have to call upon less experienced researchers or scientists, increasingly from more distant fields, often to the detriment of the quality of the review. So how did we arrive at this impasse, and what can we do to resolve it? The stakes are high, because the reputation of the whole peer-review system used in scientific publishing could be damaged in the long term.< Leer menos

Palabras clave en inglés

Scientific edition

open access

Impact factor

metrics

Metadatos

Compartir este ítem

Licencia de uso del documento

Indexing the indices: scientific publishing needs to undergo a revolution.

Idioma

Este ítem está publicado en

Resumen en inglés

Palabras clave en inglés

URI

DOI

Orígen

Centros de investigación