Afficher la notice abrégée

Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: the european context

hal.structure.identifierSchool of Environment and Technology
hal.structure.identifierr3 Environmental Technology Ltd.
dc.contributor.authorCUNDY, A.B.
hal.structure.identifierSchool of Environment and Technology
hal.structure.identifierr3 Environmental Technology Ltd.
dc.contributor.authorBARDOS, R.P.
hal.structure.identifierSchool of Environment and Technology
dc.contributor.authorCHURCH, A.
hal.structure.identifierUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life [Vienne, Autriche] [BOKU]
dc.contributor.authorPUSCHENREITER, M.
hal.structure.identifierAustrian Institute of Technology [AIT]
dc.contributor.authorFRIESL-HANL, W.
hal.structure.identifierSaxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology
dc.contributor.authorMULLER, I.
hal.structure.identifierSaxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology
dc.contributor.authorNEU, S.
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorMENCH, Michel
hal.structure.identifierCentre for Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.authorWITTERS, N.
hal.structure.identifierCentre for Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.authorVANGRONSVELD, J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T12:56:08Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T12:56:08Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/157456
dc.description.abstractEnGentle Remediation Options (GRO) are risk management strategies or techniques for contaminated sites that result in no gross reduction in soil functionality (or a net gain) as well as risk management. Intelligently applied GROs can provide: (a) rapid risk management via pathway control, through containment and stabilisation, coupled with a longer term removal or immobilisation/isolation of the contaminant source term; and (b) a range of additional economic (e.g. biomass generation), social (e.g. leisure and recreation) and environmental (e.g. CO2 sequestration) benefits. In order for these benefits to be optimised or indeed realised, effective stakeholder engagement is required. This paper reviews current sector practice in stakeholder engagement and its importance when implementing GRO and other remediation options. From this, knowledge gaps are identified, and strategies to promote more effective stakeholder engagement during GRO application are outlined. Further work is required on integrating stakeholder engagement strategies into decision support systems and tools for GRO (to raise the profile of the benefits of effective stakeholder engagement and participation, particularly with sector professionals), and developing criteria for the identification of different stakeholder profiles/categories. Demonstrator sites can make a significant contribution to stakeholder engagement via providing evidence on the effectiveness of GRO under varying site contexts and conditions. Effective and sustained engagement strategies however will be required to ensure that site risk is effectively managed over the longer-term, and that full potential benefits of GRO (e.g. CO2 sequestration, economic returns from biomass generation and “leverage” of marginal land, amenity and educational value, ecosystem services) are realised and communicated to stakeholders.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subject.enStakeholder engagement; gentle remediation; risk management; phytoremediation; contaminated land; Europe
dc.title.enDeveloping principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: the european context
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.032
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]
bordeaux.journalJournal of Environmental Management
bordeaux.page283-291
bordeaux.volume129
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioGeCo (Biodiversité Gènes & Communautés) - UMR 1202*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02646101
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02646101v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Management&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=283-291&rft.epage=283-291&rft.eissn=0301-4797&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.au=CUNDY,%20A.B.&BARDOS,%20R.P.&CHURCH,%20A.&PUSCHENREITER,%20M.&FRIESL-HANL,%20W.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée