Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierMacaulay Land Use Research Institute
dc.contributor.authorBROOKER, Rob W.
hal.structure.identifierSchool of Biological Sciences [Univ California San Diego] [UC San Diego]
dc.contributor.authorCALLAWAY, Ragan M.
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad de Concepción - University of Concepcion [Chile]
dc.contributor.authorCAVIERES, Lohengrin A.
hal.structure.identifierIlia State University [Tbilisi]
dc.contributor.authorKIKVIDZE, Zaal
hal.structure.identifierYork University
dc.contributor.authorLORTIE, Christopher J.
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
hal.structure.identifierDepartment of Biological Sciences
dc.contributor.authorMICHALET, Richard
hal.structure.identifierEstacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas
dc.contributor.authorPUGNAIRE, Francisco I.
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México = National Autonomous University of Mexico [UNAM]
dc.contributor.authorVALIENTE‐BANUET, Alfonso
hal.structure.identifierNorthern Arizona University [Flagstaff]
dc.contributor.authorWHITHAM, Thomas G.
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0003-0147
dc.description.abstractEnRicklefs’s recent call to investigate ecological processes at large scales helps focus ecologists’ attention on an undoubtedly important topic. However, we believe that some of his accompanying arguments for the primacy of such work and, in particular, for the need to “disintegrate” the local community concept are flawed. We revisit Ricklefs’s main tenets and demonstrate that research on local communities is a vital part of understanding processes and diversity across a range of spatial and temporal scales. The integration of research across spatial scales expands our horizons and understanding of ecology and evolution, and this should not be unnecessarily constrained to one extreme or the other.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Press
dc.subjectECOLOGIE
dc.subjectBIOGÉOGRAPHIE
dc.subjectINTERACTION BIOTIQUE
dc.subjectINTERACTION POSITIVE
dc.subject.enBIODIVERSITY
dc.subject.enBIOGEOGRAPHY
dc.subject.enCOMMUNITY ECOLOGY
dc.subject.enSCALE
dc.subject.enBIOTIC INTERACTIONS
dc.title.enDon't diss integration : a comment on Ricklefs's disintegrating communities
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/648058
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]
bordeaux.journalThe American Naturalist
bordeaux.page919–927
bordeaux.volume174
bordeaux.issue6
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02666800
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02666800v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20Naturalist&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=919%E2%80%93927&rft.epage=919%E2%80%93927&rft.eissn=0003-0147&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.au=BROOKER,%20Rob%20W.&CALLAWAY,%20Ragan%20M.&CAVIERES,%20Lohengrin%20A.&KIKVIDZE,%20Zaal&LORTIE,%20Christopher%20J.&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record