MULDER, Christian; BENNETT, Elena M.; BOHAN, David; BONKOWSKI, Michael; CARPENTER, Stephen R.; CHALMERS, Rachel; CRAMER, Wolfgang; DURANCE, Isabelle; EISENHAUER, Nico; FONTAINE, Colin; HAUGHTON, Alison J.; HETTELINGH, Jean-Paul; HINES, Jes; IBANEZ, Sébastien; JEPPESEN, Erik; KRUMINS, Jennifer Adams; MA, Athen; MANCINELLI, Giorgio; MASSOL, François; MC LAUGHLIN, Orla; NAEEM, Shahid; PASCUAL, Unai; PENUELAS, Josep; PETTORELLI, Nathalie; POCOCK, Michael J.O.; RAFFAELLI, Dave; RASMUSSEN, Jes J.; RUSCH, Graciela M.; SCHERBER, Christoph; SETÄLÄ, Heikki; SUTHERLAND, William J.; VACHER, Corinne; VOIGT, Winfried; VONK, J. Arie; WOOD, Stephen A.; WOODWARD, Guy

doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.10.005

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

MULDER, Christian
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [Bilthoven] [RIVM]

BENNETT, Elena M.
McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada]

BOHAN, David
Agroécologie [Dijon]

Langue

Article de revue

Ce document a été publié dans

Advances in Ecological Research. 2015, vol. 53

Elsevier

Résumé en anglais

The study of ecological services (ESs) is fast becoming a cornerstone of mainstream ecology, largely because they provide a useful means of linking functioning to societal benefits in complex systems by connecting different organizational levels. In order to identify the main challenges facing current and future ES research, we analyzed the effects of the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA, 2005) on different disciplines. Within a set of topics framed around concepts embedded within the MEA, each co-author identified five key research challenges and, where feasible, suggested possible solutions. Concepts included those related to specific service types (i.e. provisioning, supporting, regulating, cultural, aesthetic services) as well as more synthetic issues spanning the natural and social sciences, which often linked a wide range of disciplines, as was the case for the application of network theory. By merging similar responses, and removing some of the narrower suggestions from our sample pool, we distilled the key challenges into a smaller subset. We review some of the historical context to the MEA and identify some of the broader scientific and philosophical issues that still permeate discourse in this field. Finally, we consider where the greatest advances are most likely to be made in the next decade and beyond.< Réduire

Mots clés

assessment

research questions

assessment

Mots clés en anglais

biodiversity

ecological networks

ecosystem functioning

human well-being

millennium

ecosystem

science and policy

services

sustainability

biodiversity