Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions
| hal.structure.identifier | Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine [LECA] | |
| dc.contributor.author | LIANCOURT, P. | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Division of Biological Sciences | |
| dc.contributor.author | CALLAWAY, R. M. | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Biodiversité, Gènes et Ecosystèmes [BioGeCo] | |
| dc.contributor.author | MICHALET, R. | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0012-9658 | |
| dc.description.abstractEn | Theoretical models predict that the net outcome of biotic interactions among plants is the sum of co-occurring negative and positive interactions, with facilitation generally increasing in importance with increasing abiotic stress. However, species differ in fundamental niche optima; thus the intensity of stress is relative among species and important only in the context of these relative differences. We tested the hypothesis that the facilitative response of a species is relative to how much abiotic conditions deviate from the optimum conditions for that particular species (stress), and the competitive "response" ability of the species (i.e., its ability to tolerate the inhibitory effects of neighbors). In a field experiment, we examined the responses of three co-occurring species with different ecological optima, Bromus erectus, Brachypodium rupestre, and Arrhenatherum elatius, to the alleviation of a primary limiting resource (water), and to biotic interactions in a mesoxeric grassland in eastern France. We found that A. elatius had a strong positive response to watering, the response of B. rupestre was moderately positive, and B. erectus did not respond significantly, suggesting that water stress was only important for the first two species. Most importantly, the net outcome of the interaction between each species and its neighbors depended on the degree of water stress it experienced in its natural habitat. For survival, in the control plots we found no significant interactions for B. erectus (not stressed) whereas B. rupestre and A. elatius (stressed species) were facilitated. Enhancing water availability suppressed facilitation of B. rupestre and A. elatius and led to competitive exclusion of B. erectus. In contrast to survival, there was no facilitation for growth in the control plots, and competition intensity increased for all three species with watering. In our experiment the competitive response of a species was inverse to its ability to tolerate stress, indicating a trade-off between these components of the species response. A facilitative outcome appears to be a function of a species having both a low tolerance to a particular abiotic stress and a strong competitive-response ability. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Ecological Society of America | |
| dc.subject.en | Arrhenatherum elatius | |
| dc.subject.en | Brachypodium rupestre | |
| dc.subject.en | Bromus erectus | |
| dc.subject.en | competition | |
| dc.subject.en | competition interactions and stress | |
| dc.subject.en | competitive response | |
| dc.subject.en | distributional optima | |
| dc.subject.en | facilitation | |
| dc.subject.en | field experiment | |
| dc.subject.en | grassland | |
| dc.subject.en | stress tolerance | |
| dc.subject.en | water relations | |
| dc.subject.en | Salt-marsh plants | |
| dc.subject.en | positive interactions | |
| dc.subject.en | relative importance | |
| dc.subject.en | negative | |
| dc.subject.en | interactions | |
| dc.subject.en | species-diversity | |
| dc.subject.en | physical stress | |
| dc.subject.en | abiotic stress | |
| dc.subject.en | nurse-plants | |
| dc.subject.en | communities | |
| dc.title.en | Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions | |
| dc.type | Article de revue | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1890/04-1398 | |
| dc.subject.hal | Sciences de l'environnement/Biodiversité et Ecologie | |
| dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biodiversité | |
| dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Ecologie, Environnement | |
| bordeaux.journal | Ecology | |
| bordeaux.page | 1611-1618 | |
| bordeaux.volume | 86 | |
| bordeaux.issue | 6 | |
| bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | |
| hal.identifier | halsde-00294546 | |
| hal.version | 1 | |
| hal.popular | non | |
| hal.audience | Internationale | |
| hal.origin.link | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//halsde-00294546v1 | |
| bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecology&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1611-1618&rft.epage=1611-1618&rft.eissn=0012-9658&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.au=LIANCOURT,%20P.&CALLAWAY,%20R.%20M.&MICHALET,%20R.&rft.genre=article |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
| Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |
|||