Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorVALDÉS-CORRECHER, Elena
hal.structure.identifierBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences [BIOLOGY CENTRE CAS]
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of South Bohemia
dc.contributor.authorMÄNTYLÄ, Elina
hal.structure.identifierDynamiques et écologie des paysages agriforestiers [DYNAFOR]
dc.contributor.authorBARBARO, Luc
hal.structure.identifierAgro-écologie, Hydrogéochimie, Milieux et Ressources [AGHYLE]
dc.contributor.authorDAMESTOY, Thomas
hal.structure.identifierBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences [BIOLOGY CENTRE CAS]
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of South Bohemia
dc.contributor.authorSAM, Katerina
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorCASTAGNEYROL, Bastien
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifier.issn0013-8703
dc.description.abstractEnExperimental studies of biotic interactions in real field conditions are essential to un-derstand the structure and functioning of ecological networks. The use of artificial caterpillars to mimic actual prey availability is generally seen as a standard approach to compare the activity and diversity of predators along environmental gradients. Yet, even with standardized material and procedures, biases may still affect data from multiple observers with different expertise. We used pictures of artificial caterpillars with or without various predation marks, in an online survey that was targeted for the participants of the project, to evaluate the reliability of predation marks identifica-tion made by non- scientists and by scientists with and without experience in preda-tion mark identification. Pictures of artificial caterpillars displayed typical marks left by birds, mammals, and arthropods, as well as non-predation marks (‘false positive’). In total 357 respondents scanned 7140 pictures of artificial caterpillars. Scientists were more confident and accurate in their observations than non- scientists, but the differences in correct identifications among scientists and non- scientists were low. Scientists with experience were also more accurate than scientists without experi-ence, whereas there were no differences in self-confidence among scientists with and without experience. Accuracy in predation mark identification did not differ among types of predators, but respondents were more keen to identify marks left by birds or mammals than marks left by arthropods. Our results have practical implications for the design of multi-observer projects relying on artificial caterpillars as a proxy to as-sess predation intensity, in particular in the context of citizen science.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subject.enartificial prey
dc.subject.enpredation
dc.subject.enattack marks
dc.subject.enhabituation
dc.subject.encitizen science
dc.subject.enmimics
dc.subject.enfield conditions
dc.subject.enecological networks
dc.subject.enonline survey
dc.subject.enpicture quiz
dc.subject.enbiotic interaction
dc.subject.enfake caterpillar
dc.title.enFollowing the track: accuracy and reproducibility of predation assessment on artificial caterpillars
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eea.13210
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Ecologie, Environnement
bordeaux.journalEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
bordeaux.page914-921
bordeaux.volume170
bordeaux.issue10
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-03721012
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-03721012v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Entomologia%20Experimentalis%20et%20Applicata&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=170&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=914-921&rft.epage=914-921&rft.eissn=0013-8703&rft.issn=0013-8703&rft.au=VALD%C3%89S-CORRECHER,%20Elena&M%C3%84NTYL%C3%84,%20Elina&BARBARO,%20Luc&DAMESTOY,%20Thomas&SAM,%20Katerina&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record