Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations [IRGO]
dc.contributor.authorHENNEKAM, Sophie
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille [CERGAM]
dc.contributor.authorPETERSON, Jonathan
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille [CERGAM]
dc.contributor.authorTAHSSAIN-GAY, Loubna
dc.contributor.authorDUMAZERT, Jean-Pierre
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-18T13:16:15Z
dc.date.available2022-07-18T13:16:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-31
dc.identifier.issn0958-5192en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/140525
dc.description.abstractEnThis study focuses on the relationships between social power and recruitment discrimination in organizations. We examine how individuals in different hierarchical positions in organizations in France intentionally discriminate in their recruitment practices through various means of circumventing internal and external anti-discrimination policies. Social power theory is used as a theoretical framework. Twenty-eight semi-structured in-depth interviews with individuals involved in recruitment in France were conducted, transcribed and analyzed. The findings reveal two distinct strategies used to intentionally discriminate in recruitment. One strategy concentrates on outsourcing recruitment actions. In doing so, organizations can effectively divert the responsibility of upholding anti-discrimination rules and regulations to an outside party. In this strategy, the use of unwritten codes and external pressure (or the threat thereof) are employed so that the outside recruitment agency understands that it is to follow the client’s wishes over the law, which relates to coercive power. The second strategy focuses on conducting covertly controlled in-house recruitment through the use of differential and legitimate power to overrule decisions, make use of vague and complex laws, or use costs and administrative difficulties as potential business reasons which may permit discrimination. We add to a growing body of research on recruitment discrimination and power. © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enDiscrimination
dc.subject.enRecruitment
dc.subject.enPower
dc.subject.enSocial power
dc.subject.enCovert discrimination
dc.subject.enFrance
dc.subject.enAnti-discrimination policies
dc.title.enRecruitment discrimination: how organizations use social power to circumvent laws and regulations
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09585192.2019.1579251en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et managementen_US
bordeaux.journalInternational Journal of Human Resource Managementen_US
bordeaux.page2213-2241en_US
bordeaux.volume32en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesIRGO (Institut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations) - EA 4190en_US
bordeaux.issue10en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Human%20Resource%20Management&rft.date=2021-05-31&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2213-2241&rft.epage=2213-2241&rft.eissn=0958-5192&rft.issn=0958-5192&rft.au=HENNEKAM,%20Sophie&PETERSON,%20Jonathan&TAHSSAIN-GAY,%20Loubna&DUMAZERT,%20Jean-Pierre&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée