dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | DI MEGLIO, Antonio | |
hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
dc.contributor.author | CHARLES, Cecile | |
dc.contributor.author | MARTIN, Elise | |
dc.contributor.author | HAVAS, Julie | |
dc.contributor.author | GBENOU, Arnauld | |
dc.contributor.author | FLAYSAKIER, Jean-Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | MARTIN, Anne-Laure | |
dc.contributor.author | EVERHARD, Sibille | |
dc.contributor.author | LAAS, Enora | |
dc.contributor.author | CHOPIN, Nicolas | |
dc.contributor.author | VANLEMMENS, Laurence | |
dc.contributor.author | JOUANNAUD, Christelle | |
dc.contributor.author | LEVY, Christelle | |
dc.contributor.author | RIGAL, Olivier | |
dc.contributor.author | FOURNIER, Marion | |
dc.contributor.author | SOULIE, Patrick | |
dc.contributor.author | SCOTTE, Florian | |
dc.contributor.author | PISTILLI, Barbara | |
dc.contributor.author | DUMAS, Agnes | |
dc.contributor.author | MENVIELLE, Gwenn | |
dc.contributor.author | ANDRE, Fabrice | |
dc.contributor.author | MICHIELS, Stefan | |
dc.contributor.author | DAUCHY, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | VAZ-LUIS, Ines | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-13T08:02:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-13T08:02:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-07 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1540-1413 (Electronic) 1540-1405 (Linking) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/140191 | |
dc.description.abstractEn | BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) and psychosocial interventions are recommended management strategies for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Randomized trials support the use of mind-body techniques, whereas no data show benefit for homeopathy or naturopathy. METHODS: We used data from CANTO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01993498), a multicenter, prospective study of stage I-III breast cancer (BC). CRF, evaluated after primary treatment completion using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (global CRF) and QLQ-FA12 (physical, emotional, and cognitive dimensions), served as the independent variable (severe [score of ≥40/100] vs nonsevere). Outcomes of interest were adherence to PA recommendations (≥10 metabolic equivalent of task [MET] h/week [GPAQ-16]) and participation in consultations with a psychologist, psychiatrist, acupuncturist, or other complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioner (homeopath and/or naturopath) after CRF assessment. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between CRF and outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic, psychologic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Among 7,902 women diagnosed from 2012 through 2017, 36.4% reported severe global CRF, and 35.8%, 22.6%, and 14.1% reported severe physical, emotional, and cognitive CRF, respectively. Patients reporting severe global CRF were less likely to adhere to PA recommendations (60.4% vs 66.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P=.004), and slightly more likely to see a psychologist (13.8% vs 7.5%; aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.58; P=.014), psychiatrist (10.4% vs 5.0%; aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.76; P=.0064), acupuncturist (9.8% vs 6.5%; aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.17-1.82; P=.0008), or CAM practitioner (12.5% vs 8.2%; aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.23-1.82; P<.0001). There were differences in recommendation uptake by CRF dimension, including that severe physical CRF was associated with lower adherence to PA (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; P=.0001) and severe emotional CRF was associated with higher likelihood of psychologic consultations (aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.79; P=.017). CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of recommendations to improve CRF, including adequate PA and use of psychosocial services, seemed suboptimal among patients with early-stage BC, whereas there was a nonnegligible interest in homeopathy and naturopathy. Findings of this large study indicate the need to implement recommendations for managing CRF in clinical practice. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Etude des toxicités chroniques des traitements anticancéreux chez les patientes porteuses cancer | en_US |
dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
dc.title.en | Uptake of Recommendations for Posttreatment Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Breast Cancer Survivors | |
dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7051 | en_US |
dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie | en_US |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 35130491 | en_US |
bordeaux.journal | JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | en_US |
bordeaux.page | 1-13 | en_US |
bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Bordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219 | en_US |
bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
bordeaux.institution | INSERM | en_US |
bordeaux.team | PHARES_BPH | en_US |
bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Conquer Cancer Foundation | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Rising Tide Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Susan G. Komen | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Fondation Gustave Roussy | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Breast Cancer Research Foundation | en_US |
bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Agence Nationale de la Recherche | en_US |
hal.identifier | hal-03693755 | |
hal.version | 1 | |
hal.export | true | |
dc.rights.cc | Pas de Licence CC | en_US |
bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20THE%20NATIONAL%20COMPREHENSIVE%20CANCER%20NETWORK&rft.date=2022-02-07&rft.spage=1-13&rft.epage=1-13&rft.eissn=1540-1413%20(Electronic)%201540-1405%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1540-1413%20(Electronic)%201540-1405%20(Linking)&rft.au=DI%20MEGLIO,%20Antonio&CHARLES,%20Cecile&MARTIN,%20Elise&HAVAS,%20Julie&GBENOU,%20Arnauld&rft.genre=article | |