Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHALLER, Maria C.
dc.contributor.authorASCHAUER, Constantin
dc.contributor.authorWALLISCH, Christine
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorLEFFONDRE, Karen
IDREF: 183599128
dc.contributor.authorVAN SMEDEN, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorOBERBAUER, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorHEINZE, Georg
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T15:40:45Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T15:40:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.identifier.issn1878-5921 (Electronic) 0895-4356 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/136455
dc.description.abstractEnOBJECTIVE: To identify and critically appraise risk prediction models for living donor solid organ transplant counselling. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We systematically reviewed articles describing the development or validation of prognostic risk prediction models about living donor solid organ (kidney and liver) transplantation indexed in Medline until April 4(th) 2021. Models were eligible if intended to predict, at transplant counselling, any outcome occurring after transplantation or donation in recipients or donors. Duplicate study selection, data extraction, assessment for risk of bias and quality of reporting was done using the CHARMS checklist, PRISMA recommendations, PROBAST tool, and TRIPOD Statement. RESULTS: We screened 4691 titles and included 49 studies describing 68 models (35 kidney, 33 liver transplantation). We identified 49 new risk prediction models and 19 external validations of existing models. Most models predicted recipients outcomes (n=38, 75%), e.g., kidney graft loss (29%), or mortality of liver transplant recipients (55%). Many new models (n= 46, 94%) and external validations (n=17, 89%) had a high risk of bias because of methodological weaknesses. The quality of reporting was generally poor. CONCLUSION: We advise against applying poorly developed, reported or validated prediction models. Future studies could validate or update the few identified methodologically appropriate models.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enRisk prediction models
dc.subject.enLiving donor
dc.subject.enKidney transplantation
dc.subject.enLiver transplantation
dc.subject.enSystematic review
dc.subject.enRisk of bias
dc.subject.enQuality of reporting
dc.title.enPrediction models for living organ transplantation are poorly developed, reported and validated: a systematic review
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.025en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed35124188en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen_US
bordeaux.page126-135en_US
bordeaux.volume145en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamBIOSTAT_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03606291
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2022-03-11T15:40:47Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Epidemiology&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=145&rft.spage=126-135&rft.epage=126-135&rft.eissn=1878-5921%20(Electronic)%200895-4356%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1878-5921%20(Electronic)%200895-4356%20(Linking)&rft.au=HALLER,%20Maria%20C.&ASCHAUER,%20Constantin&WALLISCH,%20Christine&LEFFONDRE,%20Karen&VAN%20SMEDEN,%20Maarten&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée