Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorDELHOMME, Benjamin
IDREF: 228324343
dc.contributor.authorTAILLANDIER, Franck
dc.contributor.authorABI-ZEID, Irène
dc.contributor.authorTHOMOPOULOS, Rallou
dc.contributor.authorBAUDRIT, Cédric
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorMORA, Laurent
IDREF: 077660870
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-21T09:52:10Z
dc.date.available2021-12-21T09:52:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifier.issn0167-9236en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113694
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/124267
dc.description.abstractEnParticipatory approaches are increasingly being used to plan policies, usually involving stakeholders with conflicting interests, visions and objectives. Participants are often passionate about their cause, especially in sensitive contexts such as their health or the environment for example. Whether involved in, or observing a debate, more often than not, it is hard to follow its progress; positions are unclear and arguments are unstructured often resulting in circular discussions. This is true both for participants in an ongoing debate hoping to reach a consensus as well as for those who, a posteriori, wish to understand what was discussed and how. However, at the current time, there are to our knowledge no tools to support real-time debates by allowing participants to visualize arguments and identifying opposing points of view in order to resolve conflicts. In order to fill this gap, we developed a model based on Dung's argumentation framework that we implemented in a tool called AIPA, along with a web-application to facilitate user interaction. AIPA allows one to formalize and visualize, in real-time, the arguments of the participants, to conduct inferences in order to identify acceptable arguments and to highlight conflicting ones. Furthermore, AIPA can be used a posteriori to summarize a debate in an easy to follow argument representation. The main contribution of AIPA is its ability to structure the debate by making the arguments chain traceable and transparent, in real-time and a posteriori, and this, with users with no expertise in argumentation. In this paper, we present AIPA along with two applications to illustrate its workings and benefits.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enArgumentation framework
dc.subject.enComputational argumentation tool
dc.subject.enConflict resolution
dc.subject.enParticipatory debate
dc.subject.enReal-time debate modeling
dc.title.enAn interface between natural language and abstract argumentation frameworks for real-time debate analysis
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dss.2021.113694en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Matériauxen_US
bordeaux.journalDecision Support Systemsen_US
bordeaux.page113694en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiersen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-03498783
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-12-21T09:52:12Z
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Decision%20Support%20Systems&rft.date=2022-03&rft.spage=113694&rft.epage=113694&rft.eissn=0167-9236&rft.issn=0167-9236&rft.au=DELHOMME,%20Benjamin&TAILLANDIER,%20Franck&ABI-ZEID,%20Ir%C3%A8ne&THOMOPOULOS,%20Rallou&BAUDRIT,%20C%C3%A9dric&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record