Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorDE GABORY, Ludovic
dc.contributor.authorBOUDARD, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorBESSEDE, Jean Pierre
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMAILLARD, Aline
dc.contributor.authorLACOMME, Sabrina
dc.contributor.authorGONTIER, Etienne
dc.contributor.authorDURAND, Marlene
hal.structure.identifierBioingénierie tissulaire [BIOTIS]
dc.contributor.authorFRICAIN, Jean-Christophe
ORCID: 0000-0001-7855-6437
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBENARD, Antoine
hal.structure.identifierBioingénierie tissulaire [BIOTIS]
dc.contributor.authorBORDENAVE, Laurence
IDREF: 057389675
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-22T11:21:51Z
dc.date.available2021-11-22T11:21:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.issn2689-3622 (Electronic) 2689-3614 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/123911
dc.description.abstractEnImportance: A validated biomaterial would have several medical advantages in septorhinoplasties requiring a large-volume graft such as avoiding donor site morbidity, making ambulatory surgery possible, and reducing surgical costs. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of a ceramic to treat saddle and crooked noses. The main endpoint was the biocompatibility of the implant. The secondary endpoint was its functional and aesthetic efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The nasal septum (NASEPT) study is a pilot multicenter noncomparative prospective phase IIa clinical trial. The biomaterial tested was a biphasic calcium phosphate implant composed of 75% hydroxyapatite and 25% beta tri calcium phosphate. This versatile material can be used to replace septal skeleton when it is absent or nonusable. We included 25 patients with a multifractured osseous and cartilaginous framework after several traumas or surgeries. The implant placement technique was identical to an extracorporeal septoplasty through the external approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was the occurrence of expected adverse and severe adverse events. The secondary endpoints were clinical functional and aesthetic results and histological microscopic modifications. Results: Any extrusion, infection, pain, and epistaxis were observed. All implants were placed in a sagittal, straight, and solid position without extralobular depression. Comparisons between pre- and postoperative symptoms showed that nasal comfort (p < 10(-4)) and quality of life (p < 10(-4)) were dramatically improved in all patients. The nasolabial angle (p = 0.047) and the columellar projection (p = 0.024) were improved after surgery. Histological data showed little submucosal inflammation at 6 months with well-differentiated epithelium. The mean follow-up was 23 months: three patients underwent revision surgery for functional or aesthetic details and four implants were removed (16%) owing to a foreign body reaction between 17 and 74 months. Conclusion and Relevance: The NASEPT implant meets functional and aesthetic requirements in complex septorhinoplasties but its long-term biocompatibility needs to be improved. It could potentially avoid donor site morbidity.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enMulticenter Pilot Study to Assess a Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Implant for Functional and Aesthetic Septorhinoplasty
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/fpsam.2020.0184en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed32700976en_US
bordeaux.journalFacial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicineen_US
bordeaux.page321-329en_US
bordeaux.volume23en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue5en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionCHU de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionInstitut Bergonié
bordeaux.teamEMOSen_US
bordeaux.teamPharmacoEpi-Drugsen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03439639
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-11-22T11:21:55Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Facial%20Plastic%20Surgery%20&%20Aesthetic%20Medicine&amp;rft.date=2021-09&amp;rft.volume=23&amp;rft.issue=5&amp;rft.spage=321-329&amp;rft.epage=321-329&amp;rft.eissn=2689-3622%20(Electronic)%202689-3614%20(Linking)&amp;rft.issn=2689-3622%20(Electronic)%202689-3614%20(Linking)&amp;rft.au=DE%20GABORY,%20Ludovic&amp;BOUDARD,%20Philippe&amp;BESSEDE,%20Jean%20Pierre&amp;MAILLARD,%20Aline&amp;LACOMME,%20Sabrina&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée