Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierCentre de Recherche et de Documentation Européennes et Internationales [CRDEI]
dc.contributor.authorFLAVIER, Hugo
IDREF: 077834461
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T11:55:05Z
dc.date.available2021-10-20T11:55:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn2309-8678en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/112834
dc.description.abstractEnDebate as to the relationship between law and power in Russia has long focused on the study of hard power. Adopting the work done on soft power in the sphere of American political science, and as part of a legal analysis, we wish to show that Russia has also developed her own soft power based in part on a strategy of normative influence. Law is thus part of a trend in regaining power that has previously been lost. Admittedly this strategy is not, in itself, the preserve of Russia, as is shown by the European Union’s own use of the same approach. The fact remains, however, that there are aspects specific to Russia. Indeed, it may be possible to isolate three types of normative influence in Russia, the construction of which is linked, in part, to her history. Firstly, there is the normative legacy of the Soviet Union. A direct consequence of history, Russia has set about making that legacy bear fruit or, at the very least, ensuring that it is not fundamentally challenged. Secondly, and particularly by relying on the CIS’s institutional and political springboards, Russia has succeeded in promoting the normative alignment of those countries that she seeks to influence, which we have termed the promotion of normative convergence. Thirdly, and with greater vigour, Russia now promotes a veritable normative expansion that is increasingly based on a fait accompli rather than persuasion. These are the three types of influence that we propose to examine in this article, limiting the legal analysis to two countries that are directly concerned with this strategy: Ukraine and Belarus.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enRussia’s Normative Influence over Post-Soviet States: The Examples of Belarus and Ukraine
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-1-6-32en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Sociétéen_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Droiten_US
bordeaux.journalRussian Law Journalen_US
bordeaux.page6-32en_US
bordeaux.volume3en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesCentre de Recherche et de Documentation Européennes et Internationales (CRDEI) - EA 4193en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcehal
hal.identifierhal-03250636
hal.version1
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcehal
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Russian%20Law%20Journal&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6-32&rft.epage=6-32&rft.eissn=2309-8678&rft.issn=2309-8678&rft.au=FLAVIER,%20Hugo&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée